Blog purpose

This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA. The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore, The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them. Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted. Blog author serves as a moderator. For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com

Blog rules

  • Stay on topic.
  • No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
  • NO NAME CALLING.
  • No political debate.
  • Posts and comments are posted several times a day.

Monday, December 6, 2021

Isn't odd?



I find it very very odd that a real investigative reporter has not reviewed the near concurrent departure of NNSA LANS Field Office Manager Lebak at or about the time LANL Director McMIllan stepped out of LANL management. Was Lebak complicit with something not made public?

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

A four-year old axe to grind? Sort of a silly post...

Anonymous said...

"A four-year old axe to grind? Sort of a silly post..."

I would agree with you if the NNSA HQ was planning to shut down LANL, or remove all hazardous and potentially catastrophic activities away from LANL, but as you may know in 2021, the NNSA approved the production of 30 Plutonium pits per year at LANL, among many other dangerous activities that occur or will occur at LANL.

This LANL Field Office Manager didn't transfer to another NNSA assignment , instead, she "voluntarily" elected to retire from NNSA employment entirely at the age of ~50. There were numerous safety mishaps under the leadership of Director McMillan and LANS management. NNSA Field Office Managers are responsible for objective contractor oversight and to evaluate the operations of the contractor. NNSA Field Office Managers are not by one way or another, permitted to enable more safety or performance deficiencies of the contractor. This must be the standard. NNSA Field Office Managers must be held directly accountable, otherwise employees that work at LANL, taxpayers, and downwinders, may be impacted for a failure to address root clauses of the numerous deficiencies at LANL. You can't wave a NNSA Field Office Manager through (if NNSA HQ did) and expect the same problems at LANL will not resurface.

FYI July 27, 2021:

"Huntington Ingalls Industries Announces Kimberly Lebak as New President and General Manager of N3B Joint Venture...As president and general manager of N3B, Lebak is responsible for managing the 10-year, $1.4 billion Los Alamos legacy cleanup contract for the U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Management’s Los Alamos Field Office."

https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/07/27/2269654/14858/en/Photo-Release-Huntington-Ingalls-Industries-Announces-Kimberly-Lebak-as-New-President-and-General-Manager-of-N3B-Joint-Venture.html


Anonymous said...


12/06/2021 4:53 PM

That was a rather long winded way to say that yes it is about a four-year old axe to grind. Got it.

Anonymous said...

So,is Charlie going to work for Kim now?

Anonymous said...

Kim decided to enhance her retirement portfolio? *yawn*

Anonymous said...

"Lebak is responsible for managing the 10-year, $1.4 billion Los Alamos legacy cleanup contract for the U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Management’s Los Alamos Field Office."

"2014 nuclear accident in N.M. ranks among costliest in U.S. history

The direct cost of the cleanup is now $640 million, based on a contract modification made last month with Nuclear Waste Partnership that increased the cost from $1.3 billion to nearly $2 billion."

https://www.thedailyworld.com/nation-world/2014-nuclear-accident-in-n-m-ranks-among-costliest-in-u-s-history/

The irony of revolving doors.

Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days