Skip to main content

George Says ?

Earlier today, Director George Miller issued a statement to employees regarding the workforce restructuring process.

The following is his message:

Today we will begin the next step in the workforce restructuring process that will result in the notification and release of flexible term and supplemental labor employees. Dedicated people who have contributed to this institution will be leaving. I want to personally thank them all for their contributions and wish them well in their future endeavors – we will truly miss them.

These changes, while particularly difficult, are part of the steps we are taking to position the Laboratory for the future and ensure our continuing ability to contribute to the solution of the country’s and the world’s most challenging problems. I will be holding an all-hands meeting on Jan. 17 to further discuss my vision of the future, the strategies that will help us accomplish that vision and my perspective on the opportunities and challenges facing the Laboratory in the coming year. In addition, I will discuss the allocation of the federal budget to the Department of Energy’s individual sites and my decisions on further workforce restructuring and the compensation increase program.

Comments

Anonymous said…
translation: FTEs your next!!!!
Anonymous said…
I'm going to bet on the fact that it will be more bad news.

George: We couldn't get enough term employees to leave so now we have to up the quantity of FTE's that will be let go in April. We're 100 term employees short from meeting our goal.

I'm sorry I have to put you through this but the budget is tighter than we thought, so we need deeper cuts across the board, except management.

They are vital to the success of the lab. have a great day. You're my family.
Anonymous said…
Well we might get some sort of preview when we hear what Anastasio tells the troops down at LANL.

Anyone else find it disturbing that we never saw the 3161 comments? Guess we'll only get the results next Thursday when they reveal the site-specific plan.

My bet is George is going to keep the raise package for LLNS and announce a SSP needing about 400 volunteers.
Anonymous said…
"We couldn't get enough term employees to leave..."

I haven't noticed anyone giving the terms a choice in the matter.

Remember: terms and SLO's address this year's budget, whereas savings from releasing career employees don't really show up until next year because of the severance pay.

The hard question is what does FY09's budget look like?
Anonymous said…
Those comments were supposed to be posted at the URL below, but as you can see they are not. Could we please have 8000 people write Homer and find out why.

LLNL 3161 Comments ??

Where the heck are they? It's been months and we were promised this before people were thrown out the gate. As you can see, we have been told another lie.
Anonymous said…
Just in case the URL goes dead

Draft Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Workforce Restructuring Plan and Press Release


The below draft plan is available for public comment through November 5, 2007. The draft plan will be finalized at the end of the stakeholder comment period.

October 22, 2007 Press Release
Draft Workforce Restructuring Plan - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - FY 2008
Comments on the draft plan should be directed to:
Homer Williamson,
Contracting Officer,
NNSA Livermore Site Office,
P.O. Box 808, L-293,
Livermore, CA 94550;
by e-mail: homer.williamson@oak.doe.gov;
or by fax to (925) 423-7668.
Anonymous said…
"The hard question is what does FY09's budget look like?

January 7, 2008 8:29 PM

I suspect that we will see unannouced RIF's for the next two years as happened in Berkeley. After two years things will start to stablilize but they will never be the same and the fear factor of not having a job tomorrow will always be there. It's a dog eat dog world. Welcome to privitization and the wool they pulled over the tax payers eyes.
Anonymous said…
Am I missing something? Where is the promise to post the comments?

Section II. A. “Stakeholder Input” of the draft says they’ll post the draft for 7 a day comment period, analyze the comments, change the draft in light of comments, IF APPROVED, submit the final plan to DOE & NSSA, transmit the approved plan to Congress, distribute the approved Plan and post it on the LSO Site Office website.

Section II. C. 2. “Communications” only says they’ll tell the employees before releasing any info to the media.

I’d love to see the comments but I can’t find a promise to post them? I don’t think we’ll ever see them.
Anonymous said…
How many employees can withstand 2 years of fear factor?

I propose that instead, we run for another 8 months, then shut the place down. If congress wants it back up and running, they can fix the mess at that time.

Sometimes it takes a full crisis before people act accordingly.
Anonymous said…
Hundreds are being sent out the gate and only 14 people took the poll. I hope those that got booted will come back and voice their opinions in many ways. There's always _April 1st_ of every year at the gates. This time maybe you'll join in with your own agenda. I'll be there soon too. Join POGO and point out where the money is being waste on layers of upper level managment is also an option. I've already made contact and point out this fact.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!