Skip to main content

where are the comments on the 3161 plan?

Contributed by anonymous:

The comments were supposed to be posted at the URL below, but as you can see they are not. Could we please have 8000 people write Homer and find out why.


LLNL 3161 Comments


Where are they? It's been months and we were promised this before people were thrown out the gate. As you can see, we have been told another lie.

Just in case the URL goes dead in the next few days, here is Homer's info:

Draft Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Workforce Restructuring Plan and Press Release


The below draft plan is available for public comment through November 5, 2007. The draft plan will be finalized at the end of the stakeholder comment period.

October 22, 2007 Press Release
Draft Workforce Restructuring Plan - Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - FY 2008
Comments on the draft plan should be directed to:
Homer Williamson,
Contracting Officer,
NNSA Livermore Site Office,
P.O. Box 808, L-293,
Livermore, CA 94550;
by e-mail:
Homer Williamson homer.williamson@oak.doe.gov

or by fax to (925) 423-7668.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Sorry Scooby - I originally submitted this under "George says". It belongs under the 3161 comments thread...

Am I missing something? Where is the promise to post the comments?

Section II. A. “Stakeholder Input” of the draft says they’ll post the draft for a 7 day comment period, analyze the comments, change the draft in light of comments, IF APPROVED, submit the final plan to DOE & NSSA, transmit the approved plan to Congress, distribute the approved Plan and post it on the LSO Site Office website.

Section II. C. 2. “Communications” only says they’ll tell the employees before releasing any info to the media.

I’d love to see the comments but I can’t find a promise to post them? I don’t think we’ll ever see them.
Anonymous said…
Is Homer Williamson a real person? Anyone know?
Anonymous said…
Homer is a real person and will reply. The address is correct. I actaully got an e-mail from he/she and they said that NNSA is the hold up. That was 30 days ago, so please find out for yourself what's the hold up this time. I urge all of you to ask questions and demand that we get to see the comments.
Anonymous said…
LANL's 3161 was ahead of the LLNL plan and NEVER posted any comments either. We don't even have a name- just DOE-Al...
Anonymous said…
"LANL's 3161 was ahead of the LLNL plan and NEVER posted any comments either."

The Nevada Test Site 3161 Plan comment resolutions were posted, and in a fairly decent timeframe.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Rumor corner

LLNS may have excluded the wrong people in last VSSOP? The exclusions were based on outdated job categories and related skills. ULM are now thinking that in the future, job categories and functional areas will have to be re-defined. The next VSSOP/ISP will be based on the new categories and functional areas. The questions I have are: 1) Why didnt they think of that before the transition. It seems like their style is “change things as you go”. Planning is out the window! 2) Who will give input on the new changes? The next RIF apparently is going to be more lucrative than the VSSOP. Depending on the length of employment, a RIFed person, not only gets their 1 week pay per year of service but also from 30 to 120 days notice, essentially 30 to 120 days pay. Please feel free to comment on the rumors or add new ones you actually heard.