Skip to main content

Job classification question

Image
By scooby
Anonymous asked:
Does anyone know what four digit job classifications are going to be reduced and what the target numbers are for each of those classifications? Management certainly won't tell us. Even and educated guess would be better than no information.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Didn't someone ask GM that at the all-hands and he said it was in the original 3161 document??
4/20/2008 7:06 PM
Anonymous said…
The 3161 is good for 2 years. They don't need to renew it. It's a living document. Stand by for wave to leave since the doors are wide open and ULM knows no other means of resolving their problems including paying for the 120 days given to all 200 with over 20 years. Yes we are going to see more lay-offs to pay for the time these people will be on site looking for a job. Now there's an injustice to us ALL.
4/20/2008 7:27 PM
Anonymous said…
It depends on your business unit. The same 4-digit classification in one unit may be dealt with differently in another.
4/20/2008 8:16 PM
Anonymous said…
The 3161 is good for two years or 750 FTSs, which ever comes first. Once LLNS dumps the 535 involuntarily, this 3161 is over.

Despite GM's optimism, the FY09 budget has a lot of possibilities for cuts not yet annnounced, so do not be surprised if we have another next fall.
4/20/2008 8:18 PM
Anonymous said…
Layoffs are going to be a constant theme at the new LLC run labs. Get use to much higher stress, stagnant wages, and crazy new policies designed to make your work more difficult to accomplish.

NNSA has managed to destroy what were once the crown jewels of America's national lab system. Congress could do something about this decline, but I wouldn't count on it. It's game over.
4/21/2008 9:14 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

LLNL un-diversity

By scooby
Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!
79 comments
Read more