Skip to main content

Lets Be Postive For A Change

Please post anon.

This is very hard for me to write no longer believe but I think it would be fun to see what input this will bring. I sincerely hope only positive comments about LLNL future will be posted under this topics no matter how bad people are going to want to jump all over the poster anatomy. I'm hoping the nay-sayers will just allow the people who have a positive attitude and out look for LLNL to post their honest opinions, hopes and dreams. Maybe some of us will actually be able to see some hope and light at the end of the tunnel.

So lets assume George is not lying and FY-09 funding is adequate to sustain the life of all who remain at LLNL after Oct 1st, 2008 and all projects are funded 100%. Can anyone paint a picture of what we'll be doing at LLNL for the next year and how the outcome of these jobs will benefit the nation?

Comments

Anonymous said…
"people with a positive outlook for LLNL" should wake up from their leave-it-to-beaver fantasy world. They need to watch out for the sucker punch from LLNS. The one that ends their career with no warning. A "Heres a box..pack your stuff" kind of punch.
Neko said…
Yes, there is a future - this post actually made me do something I've not done in months . . . laugh!
Anonymous said…
Positive! It's all about perspective now isn't it. If this Blog was to really serve the interests of the people, then it wouldn't be asking for a response to this silly *!@# post, because topics like this, wouldn't be posted!

For a place claiming to have the best and the brightest, I haven't seen any post that reflects anything close to what's actually going on at the Lab, let alone the world. If you did, you would understand that LLNS is just doing what it has to do if it wants to play in the Global capital market. Let's face it, big science is dead in a Global economy. Nuclear bombs are relics of the cold war and we can't use them to fight terrorists who use box-cutters. If you have paid attention to the two presidential candidates, its no new stuff and lets down size via a renegotiated treaty with Russia, just keeping a few for deterrence.
Homeland security of course is a new growth industry based upon fear. Again, with another administration, this might fall apart, especially when we find out the boogie man is not real.
Energy, hell the private sector, which includes just about every country with a science base, is competing, so why invest in another National Lab, especially when we have NREL.
Future of LLNL: Big Computers (for now)as most anyone with a few million, can buy them. NIF, yeah we have the corner on this, all we need are paying customers. What else is unique to LLNL? And who will pay the enormous rates?

Oh yeah, a positive statement: Since you all are on your own since 10/1, if you have marketable SKA, get out, if not get them and get out, else stay and pray.
Unknown said…
There is a bright future at LLNL for many, and the more we cooperate to build that future, the more will share in it. My prediction, a year from now we'll be doing more work for others - especially in analytical devices for medicine, alternative energy, and information mining and management.
Anonymous said…
Neko, thank you. I also have not laughed for months... until reading your post.

To the original poster: The Lab as we knew it has seen much adversity and change in it's 58-year history. They have always managed to come back strong and survive. Note I said "The Lab as we knew it". Unfortunately, I think that Lab is dead. The new corporate mind-set is all about profit and not at all about employees.

I'd like to me more positive. I was extremely proud to work at the Lab. And I had hoped to finish out my career there, but all that changed on May 22.

It will be critical for those of you remaining to have positive attitudes. I wish you the best, but please (for your own sake) be prepared for the worst.
Anonymous said…
I happened to run into someone that I worked with at Sandia years ago. His comments gave me an idea of what people at the other labs think of LLNL - let's just say they are NOT impressed. So I am -- positive-- that has achieved mediocrity in management and has nowhere to go but down.
Anonymous said…
A 'semi-NNSA' lab like Sandia looks OK, while some of the other DOE labs look like they have a great future. I would take a closer look at working for a DOE lab like ORNL or PNNL.

There is a bright future for America's National Labs, it just won't be happening at the labs that are controlled by the idiots over at NNSA.

Make use of your Q clearance and look elsewhere in the DOE complex for a scientific position. The exodus of good scientists from the weapon labs are going to flood the other DOE labs with a lot of eager applicants. Get in line before this line grows too long.

It should be clear by now that the nuclear weapon labs are facing a dismal future. They are not the place at which to nurture your career. That doesn't mean you can't leverage your Q clearance to snag a great job from somewhere else within the DOE complex.
Anonymous said…
Here's a positive note, finally. I wonder how this will afect LLNL budget.

Hillary to endorse Obama; drop out by week's end
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Article Launched: 06/04/2008 04:39:06 PM PDT


WASHINGTON - Hillary Rodham Clinton has decided to end her historic presidential campaign while leaving her options open to retain her delegates and promote her issue agenda, a campaign official says.

The former first lady told House Democrats during a private conference call Wednesday that she will express support for Barack Obama's candidacy and congratulate him for gathering the necessary delegates to be the party's nominee.

"Senator Clinton will be hosting an event in Washington, D.C., to thank her supporters and express her support for Senator Obama and party unity. This event will be held on Saturday to accommodate more of Senator Clinton's supporters who want to attend," her communications director Howard Wolfson said.

Also in the speech, Clinton will urge once-warring Democrats to focus on the general election and defeating Republican presidential candidate John McCain.

The announcement brought to a close an epic five-month nominating battle pitting the first serious female candidate against the most viable black contender ever.

Obama Tuesday night secured the 2,118 delegates to claim the Democratic nomination, but Clinton stopped short of acknowledging that milestone, saying she would.

An adviser said Clinton and her lieutenants had discussed various ways a presidential candidacy can end, including suspending the campaign to retain control of her convention delegates and sustain her visibility in an effort to promote her signature issue of health care.

The other options include freeing her delegates to back Obama and ending her candidacy unconditionally. The official stressed that neither Clinton nor her inner circle had decided specifically what course to take other than to recognize that the active state of her bid to become the nation's first female president had ended.

On the telephone call with impatient congressional supporters, Clinton was urged to draw a close to the contentious campaign, or at least express support for Obama. Her decision to acquiesce caught many in the campaign by surprise and left the campaign scrambling to finalize the logistics and specifics behind her campaign departure.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!