Skip to main content

The 46 DOE BES Energy Frontiers Research Centers

Anonymous said...

The 46 DOE BES Energy Frontiers Research Centers were announced and LLNL did not get funding for their proposed center to study materials for nuclear reactors (special focus on LIFE reactor materials). In fact, all the other national labs got multiple centers funded at several million dollars per year. LLNL is a minor participant on three centers, but does not lead any. For example, LANL and Sandia are each involved in 14 of the centers.

April 28, 2009 9:20 PM

Comments

Anonymous said…
LLNL gave up on reactors decades ago; not as fancy as MFE or ICF. About 10 years ago it tried to get into the mix with the other labs, which had kept active in reactor issues. Not a surprise it has not broken back into the field and never will.
Anonymous said…
LIFE ends up being death for the lab. Nobody takes it seriously.
Anonymous said…
We need to quit developing a technology and then trying to find a need for it. LIFE has no life.
Anonymous said…
We need to quit developing a technology and then trying to find a need...Not saying this is easy, but actually Silicon Valley has had more than one success that way. But you need really good marketing people to pull it off.
Anonymous said…
Last year I took a potential submission for a fuel cell design to Wayne King and was told that there would be no applications to BES in the foreseeable future. Well it'll now get researched elsewhere. Is Wayne King elsewhere yet??
Anonymous said…
There is very little innovation going on at LLNL. Most of the stuff I have seen people try to start got stopped, delayed, taxed out of existence. The ideas are there, I hear them from people all the time. But if it doesn't come from a managers mouth, or the manager can't somehow take it as their own, they will stop it. Or if a manager supports it, the next 8 layers will stop it.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!