Skip to main content

Paranoia

Image
By
Anonymous said...

Has anyone ever noticed the amazing similarity between working at LLNS and the board game Paranoia?

Write-up for that game here. Paranoia

April 4, 2009 6:27 AM

Comments

Anonymous said…
What would make you believe that. I see none what so ever on this blog. What I do see is people looking for answers to questions so they can plan their future. ULM's knows the answers to the questions but don't want the worker to know until it's to late. No one at LLNL is ever going to trust management again. Not now and not ever.
4/04/2009 11:45 AM
Anonymous said…
I see absolutely no comparison between working here and this game. Please explain what you mean.
4/04/2009 4:06 PM
Anonymous said…
LOL!

Information is on need to know, and you don't know anything.

The rules are contradictory, and the powers that be smack you hard anytime they like.

Huge amounts of infighting and backstabbing.

Secret agendas.

Most of the cool stuff ends up killing you.

Was this game designed by someone at LLNL? More important, where can I find it?
4/05/2009 9:54 AM
Anonymous said…
I played this game in my younger years. And yes there are similarities when you have a whacked GM.

Hmmm. "GM" is short for both "Game Master" and the Lab Director.

Coincidence? You be the judge.
4/05/2009 6:01 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

tcp1 looking good

By scooby
I just received my annual TCP-1 letter from LLNS and a summary of the LLNS Pension Plan. Looked in pretty good shape in 2013. About 35% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 134.92%). This was a decrease from 2012 where it was 51% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 151.59%). They did note that the 2012 change in the law on how liabilities are calculated using interest rates improved the plan's position. Without the change the funding target attainment percentages would have been 118% (2012) and 105% (2013). 2013 assets = $2,057,866,902 2013 liabilities = $1,525,162,784 vs 2012 assets = $1,844,924,947 2012 liabilities = $1,217,043,150 It was also noted that a slightly different calculation method ("fair market value") designed to show a clearer picture of the plan' status as December 31, 2013 had; Assets = $2,403,098,433 Liabilities = $2,068,984,256 Funding ratio = 116.15% Its a closed plan with 3,781 participants. Of that number, 3,151 wer...
105 comments
Read more