Skip to main content

Expired Hand Sanitizer!

So, did anyone else notice the "free" Hand Sanitizer the lab is handing out is EXPIRED?

Comments

Anonymous said…
Yes, but the 'experts' assure us that it's still 'effective'.
Anonymous said…
There is a reason for expiration dates, sint there?
Anonymous said…
I believe the manufacture was contacted by HSD and stated they were still effective. In a sealed produce like this, its typically the "look" of the material that will change with time and not the effectiveness. Also as you can imagine hand sanitizer is in very short supply - especially large bulk orders.
Anonymous said…
It's cheaper to buy that way. Just double up on the amount and I'm sure it will work fine. Also, try to ignore the "Made in Mexico" label on the back of the packets.
Anonymous said…
ex=has been spurt=drip under pressure
Anonymous said…
Yes there is a reason. That being the time at which a manufacturer can no longer promise the product is as effective as stated.

Given LLNS mind-set, handing out out-of-warranty materials to it's slave worker class makes perfect sense. Especially during a growing flu pandemic.

Come over here, GM. *COUGH*
Anonymous said…
Purell contains 62% ethyl alcohol... does alcohol go bad?
Anonymous said…
hand sanitizers? is that all there is going on at the lab these days? what a mess!
Anonymous said…
Since it has alcohol in it that might be considered hazardous, I'm surprised that:

1. It didn't have a lovely yellow bar code sticker on it.

2. That I was not required to take web class on how to use it.

I suppose that that after all the bottles are used up and tossed, some idiot from NNSA will come up with a finding that it was hazardous material and that we should have had stickers, classes and triple bagged it before putting the empty container into a stainless steel barrel and shipped off to a hazardous waste dump. Fines will be levied, congress will hold hearings. Bechtel will lose bonus money and then figures it would be cheaper to let people get sick or die.

And the sad thing is that imagined scenario is plausible.
Anonymous said…
May 16, 2009 8:49 AM
"And the sad thing is that imagined scenario is plausible."

It is not only plausible, it is likely. We need to reduce the NNSA staff to the level that DOE-SAN had when I first came to the Lab in the early 1980s--a handful of clueless bureaucrats who were happy to have a cushy job and didn't get in the way of real science.
Anonymous said…
May 16, 2009 8:49 AM
Plausible except that Bechtel will keep the bonus
Anonymous said…
"There is a reason for expiration dates, sint there?"

Just as there are reasons to get your measurement and test equipment calibrated. Otherwise, you are just practicing risk management.
Jessica said…
The reason for expiration dates doesn't mean that it is "bad" the ingredient in hand sanitizer is alcohol. I believe it evaporates, making the "expired hand sanitizer" less effective and not being able to kill "99.99% of germs"
Anonymous said…
Who is the experts on Hand Sanitizer any how

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!