Skip to main content

Gross miscalculation?

Bruzer said:

Did Anyone else read in the "Daily Clips" Monday, that between Sandia & LLNL they will be hiring 500 employees due to the expected number of employees that will be naturally retiring?
I think what really is going on is they just now figured out they laid off too many outstanding employees and won't have the correct talent available come 2012!!!

Comments

Anonymous said…
400 managers to create additional regulations and procedures for mere mortals doomed to die.

90 special managers at large to come up with newer and dumber ways to waste money in their halls of fine stone.

9 new ADs to ride fell beasts, swooping down to snatch anyone with talent and then drop the to their death ( professionally ).

1 moron to rule them all and in the darkness bind them.
Anonymous said…
Well all I can say is "I'll believe it when I see it"....

To date I have yet to see them do as they 'promise/say'...!!

So, will they begin to re-call some VERY good FTE folks who were let go due and only due to the seniority factor.

I personally was let go because I promoted "too fast and could not compete with seniority".

And before I get 'slammed' with negative feedback, I do have 11 years worth of PA's to back that one.

My last classification served I had 6 years of service....via fell into the low numbers of those being ISP'd.

This currently unemployed ISP'd would greatly enjoy the opportunity to work once again-the employer doesn't matter at this point, what does matter is becoming once again gainfully employed and taking pride in a full days work for a full days pay!!!
Anonymous said…
Sandia has announced that they intend to hire 80 people for the California site in the next year. I don't know about the New Mexico site.

- a Sandian
Anonymous said…
I hope they hire back those layed off first. They were good quality people for the most part. Yes, PA's were altered to shift people around as layoff candidates.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!