Skip to main content

A Snowball's chance in...

Anonymously contributed:

NOT Going to Happen... A Snowball's chance in...

Nuclear Weapons & Materials Monitor - Martin Schneider

July 1, 2011
White House Considering Merging DOE With Commerce Department

The idea of broadly restructuring the Department of Energy is set to make a return engagement for the 2012 Presidential Election, with President Obama preparing to float the possibility of a new Department of Competitiveness that would include most of DOE as part of his reelection campaign, NW&M Monitor has learned. The proposal would consolidate the Department of Commerce with non-defense portions of the Department of Energy such as the Department’s loan office, Office of Nuclear Energy, Fossil Energy, and Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. The National Nuclear Security Administration would be split off into a separate standalone agency. It remains unclear where the offices of Environmental Management and Legacy Management would end up under the proposal.

The merger, which has been proposed in a white paper by White House Office of Management and Budget Deputy Director Jeffrey Zients, would seek to better position the United States to compete against other countries with state- controlled industry, while freeing up the disparate missions within the Department of Energy. Industry officials expect the proposal to enjoy support from Democrats and opposition from Republicans. John Bryson, the Obama Administration’s nominee to be the next Secretary of Commerce, is likely to begin floating the idea if he is confirmed by the Senate.

Comments

thief said…
Works for me! I figure I've got about two years to go before I can bail on my own terms. Crap it will take the new organization two years just to properly craft a mission statement let alone take any significant workforce actions!

Truthfully though congress should choke the DOE to death in its sleep and push NNSA into DOD after stripping as much stupid out as possible (I know it won't happen but a boy can dream can't he)!
Anonymous said…
The AEC was a wonderful thing. Scientists managing scientists, with everyone agreeing on the mission, and the managers willing to fund it. All that would be required now is a complete overhaul of NNSA's structure and personnel.
Anonymous said…
Oh yeah, I really want NNSA to be part of DoD. After all, Admiral Nanos worked out so well for LANL. And look at those DoD labs like AFRL, NRL, and ARL, just cutting-edge research once they got done firing all the egg-heads and replacing them with contract monitors. Great idea.
thief said…
Oh yeah, I really want NNSA to be part of DoD. After all, Admiral Nanos worked out so well for LANL. And look at those DoD labs like AFRL, NRL, and ARL, just cutting-edge research once they got done firing all the egg-heads and replacing them with contract monitors. Great idea.

sotto voce.....I guess they neglected to mention it to you....nuclear weapons....well they have something to do with national defense. What that something is I leave to you for a homework assignment.

But you're right the Commerce Department National Labs are far superior!

Yutz!
Anonymous said…
Here are some way better Departments we should reside in:

Department of the Treasury
Department of Justice
Department of Health and Human Services
Department of Agriculture

Let's face it no one wants nuclear weapons except Russia, China, North Korea, Iraq, Iran, and al Quaeda. Come on DoD, have some stones and take this "operation" over.
Anonymous said…
Truthfully though congress should choke the DOE to death in its sleep and push NNSA into DOD after stripping as much stupid out as possible (I know it won't happen but a boy can dream can't he)!

July 6, 2011 7:22 PM

Problem is Congress couldn't "choke a chicken" if it's life depended on it. We've become a bunch of winning babies.
Anonymous said…
Agree not a chance of happening due to the various self-interest in Congress wanting to keep their oversight and appropriation committee jobs.

But one can dream... so in addition to combining non-defense parts of DOE with Commerce, I would also take out the Office of Science - and turn it into the Department of Science.

The new Dept of Science (headed by Dr. Chu) would have all the national labs (including LLNL, LANL, and SNL) plus NASA and NIST.

The new completely independent NNSA would be the "hands-on" production/testing elements of the current NNSA - Pantex, Kansas City Plant, SRS, NTS, and Y-12. I'd also give them the pit production facility at LANL.

The stockpile science and research elements would still be carried out by Dept of Science labs (LANL, LLNL, SNL) as part of their missions, but NNSA would not own the facilities, just fund the work.
Anonymous said…
The two liberal Senators from the state of New Mexico will never support taking the labs or NNSA out of DOE. They like things just as they are, regardless of how totally messed up this current situation has become.

This talk is just "window dressing" in preparation for the 2012 elections. It will never happen.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!