Skip to main content

Sandia retirees

Anonymously contributed:

Has anyone heard the numbers of employees who retired by the end of December at Sandia? As their retirement program was changing effective Jan 1 2012, I heard they expected about 1,000 employees to retire in 2011 before the new formula took effect. I'm wondering if any of the Sandia employees will be applying at LLNL.

Comments

Anonymous said…
The number I heard was about 600 by close of the year.
Anonymous said…
I am not sure about LLNL but I have heard of a number Sandia people who plan on starting at LANL 2012. I think these people live in Santa Fe or plan on moving there. I am not sure about the exact number.
Anonymous said…
Retirements Soar at Sandia
By John Fleck / Journal Staff Writer on Sat, Jan 14, 2012
[Print-Friendly Version]
[Email This Story] view comments

Sandia National Laboratories lost 511 people to retirement in the final three months of 2011, an unusually large number as workers moved to lock in retiree health and pension benefits before reductions began on Jan. 1.

That brings to about 940 the number of retirees over the past 15 months, nearly three times the normal retirement rate of 330 over comparable periods in the past, according to Sandia data. Sandia officials declined to comment on the issue beyond releasing the retirement numbers.

In 2009, Sandia announced it was capping its generous retiree health benefit program. For retirees with 30 years of service, for example, Sandia currently pays 90 percent of health care costs between the date of retirement and when the person becomes eligible for Medicare. The change put a cap on those payments for people who retire after Jan. 1, 2012. If premiums rise, Sandia will not pay the increased costs.

Also, Sandia changed the way retirement benefits are calculated, which had the effect of reducing pensions for employees who retire after Jan. 1, 2012. For example, under the changes, employees retiring in 2015 after 28 years of service with a final salary of $111,000 would see their pension drop from $52,200 a year to $48,600 a year, according to Sandia.

When Sandia announced the benefit changes in 2009, there were fears the nuclear weapons research center could see as many as 1,500 retirements, with the departures coming at a time when federal officials were expressing fears about the loss of nuclear weapons expertise.

Sandia hired 1,130 new employees in 2011, according to spokesman Jim Danneskiold, with the hiring focused on creating an opportunity for the new workers to learn from the retirees before they left.
— This article appeared on page A1 of the Albuquerque Journal
Anonymous said…
The plan is to get rid of all the older NNSA lab employees who may have great experience and expertise but are seen as too expensive by the highly compensated "for profit" LLC management team now in place at the labs.

The latest experience at SNL clearly shows that lab management is working hard to push expertise out the front door and replace it with a low cost, young, inexperienced labor force.

Good look with that one!
Anonymous said…
Why stick around when you have 15+ more years of career work under that management? What would have been the next "disincentive to stay"? I will be amazed if there is not a class action suit on age discrimination. They got what they wanted, reduced costs of labor, but they forgot, expensive labor is expensive for a reason, it is very productive and versatile. The cost problem there is not staff labor cost too high, it is the incredible growth in management layers and increase in numbers of non-technical administrators, budgeteers, marketeers, and opulent new construction for facilities with huge operating overhead no one wants to pay. Gone three weeks and getting calls and emails for "HELP!"
rolekkyle said…
Well written article
Kyle Rolek CFP®

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!