Skip to main content

NIF cannot just be open-ended

from Nature | News

Nature isn’t the only one pushing back — the NIF’s funders in Congress also want answers. “We’re disappointed,” says one congressional staff member, who spoke to Nature only on condition on anonymity. Critics say that the lab’s enthusiastic promotion of the idea that laser fusion could generate electrical power led many in Congress to believe that they were funding an energy project, when in fact laser fusion is decades from producing electricity. “The lab overemphasized and oversold the energy aspect of the NIF, at the expense of the very important and successful work it was doing in stockpile stewardship and basic science,” says a senior scientist familiar with the NIF programme.

The NIF’s current director Ed Moses bridles at accusations that ignition was over­emphasized. “I don’t think it was oversold or undersold. It just was.” Moses insists that “remarkable progress” has been made in the past 16 months, since the NIF began working with hydrogen-pellet targets. “The goal was to do the initial exploration of the ignition conditions and see where we were, which is what we’ve done.”

Keeping momentum in the ignition campaign may be crucial, because many in Congress still believe in the energy-research mission being pushed by the lab. Lawmakers have mandated that a new plan for reaching ignition be delivered to them by the end of the month. Politicians are ready to accept that it may take longer than originally stated, but they need to see evidence that it is on course, the congressional staff member says: “It can’t just be an open-ended: ‘Just give us money, we promise we will do good science’.” And if the NIF fails to reach its ignition goal in a few more years? “Then we’ll have to evaluate whether it’s worth continuing to fund the facility.”

Comments

Anonymous said…
Kudos to the author.

He let Ed speak for himself, and in less than 50 words, he presented the status and debunked the myth.

Elsewhere within it is suggested a gullible legislative virgin might have been fooled and now is disappointed. More likely legislators and staff do no listen carefully enough to understand what they are being briefed.

The communication challenge, as the article states is to present the likely outcomes, the promise and risks. Then, if approved, proceed to discover what science presents itself.

Anonymous said…
It is the presenters duty to at least make sure the listener is awake, comprehension cannot be assured.

The ordinary listener cannot merit a seat at university introductory "Physics for Presidents" "mick", (mickey mouse course), yet this person is expected voters to have insights and make decisions about complex science policy.

Democracy is messy and amusing.
Anonymous said…
November 8, 2012 8:08 PM

WTF
Anonymous said…
Typical strategy for Ed to twist the truth when it does not line up with his fantasy narrative
Anonymous said…
Is it ironical that Ed looks like Harpo Marx (with dark hair) with Parney appearing as the stuffed duck? Harpo doesn't speak, honk, honk, ...this is a real charade!
Anonymous said…
So Ed is basically saying that the issue regarding the con job is oversimplifying more complex issues? Gimme a break. We don't care why he felt justified to perpetuate a con job. We don't care what kind of pressures he is under. We are calling a spade "a spade.". NIF was oversold by Ed and Tomas and the like.. How else can you explain all of the historical events? Someone put a gun to his head to perpetuate a fantasy? More complex science policy? Gimme a break. Take responsibility for your actions. And NO the ends don't justify the means. Such wanton willingness to con the public and public figures shows a fundamental flaw in his personality and moral compass.
Anonymous said…
I won't tolerate any disparaging analogies of Harpo Marx. Harpo was a great actor. Stop it now.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!