Skip to main content

NNSA report on LANL radiation leak?

Image
By scooby
NNSA report on LANL radiation leak?

Since the NNSA report on the multiple failures of the TA 55 security fence was made public, does anyone know when the report on the multiple failures of the LANSCE radiation safety controls will be released?

Comments

Anonymous said…
Please, if you cannot or are un-able to respond in a professional manner please enter you"r comments on another blog. Some of us are trying to have a decent conversation.
THANK YOU
11/08/2012 9:21 AM
Anonymous said…
Please, if you cannot or are unable to respond in a professional manner please enter you're comments on another blog.
THANK YOU
11/08/2012 9:24 AM
Anonymous said…
Probably the same guy who keeps complaining about double standards for his posts getting deleted. As far as I'm concerned, not only are the deletions justified, but google needs to give blogger IP block capabilities to permanently ban certain individuals.
11/08/2012 9:36 AM
Anonymous said…
Word is that there were over a dozen barriers, that more than 80% of them failed and the rest were ineffective.
11/08/2012 2:42 PM
Anonymous said…
Would expect to see parts of this report enlarged to poster size for Congressional hearings.

Wonder if the combination of this safety failure with the multiple cost, schedule and performance failures of the TA 55 security project rises to the level of a "show cause" letter to the contractor?
11/09/2012 12:09 PM
Anonymous said…
The report has been posted to the DOE HSS website under Type A investigations for quite a while now.
11/15/2012 10:24 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

LLNL un-diversity

By scooby
Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!
79 comments
Read more