Skip to main content

Recent "High Risk" Events at LANL

Image
By scooby
Recent "High Risk" Events at LANL

All LANL employees are being formally "warned" in lab-wide briefings from the PADS, that as a result of the Tc-99 Exposure, NUSSUP debacle, and other Security issues that LANL is facing a potential Labwide "stop work". Any more details?

Comments

Anonymous said…
Where is the all-hands memo you are referring to? Please put it on the blog.
11/16/2012 5:18 PM
Anonymous said…
There was no formal memo on this, however, there were briefings (which continue next week) across the Lab by the Principal Lab Directors informing employees of these "severity" of these events. Bishop (S&T PAD) indicated the possibility of a Lab "safety/security" stand down. It's all part of a "coverup" by Senior Management and a "takeover" by the LANS Board. They wouldn't dare advertise in a memo what is behind this.
11/16/2012 6:23 PM
Anonymous said…
It looks like the ice that McMillan and Knapp have been standing on is beginning to "crack".
11/16/2012 6:24 PM
Anonymous said…
Does McMillan even have experience working in projects that deal with experiments and radiological safety procedures? I thought he was from the design community, where the main hazard is the paper cut and carpal tunnel syndrome.
11/17/2012 1:21 AM
Anonymous said…
Does McMillan even have experience working in projects that deal with experiments and radiological safety procedures? I thought he was from the design community, where the main hazard is the paper cut and carpal tunnel syndrome.

November 17, 2012 1:21 AM

You got that right. When McMillan testified to the DNFSB in Santa Fe a few months ago on the Plutonium facility, the only thing he conveyed was what classes he took at MIT, stated he had other commitments, and made a fast exit out the back door. He did indicate "he would rather be sitting in PF-4 having a cup of coffee than his living room during an earthquake". You could see through his lack of knowledge and experience with High Hazard and Nuclear Facilities. To make matters worse, he read his testimony from a sheet a paper, still tripping over his words. It was in one word the testimony was a "disgrace".
11/17/2012 4:57 AM
Anonymous said…
Bishop (S&T PAD) indicated the possibility of a Lab "safety/security" stand down.

November 16, 2012 6:23 PM

Did anyone catch Carol Burns complaining to Bishop about the number of Senior Managers at LANL? Is Carol Burns still married to Mike Burns who is the Deputy Principal Lab Director for National Security who makes at least $650,000 a year and is she still the Division Leader for Chemistry? Combined income is upwards of near $1M per year. Carol is a really smart woman, but she doesn't know when "to keep her mouth shut".
11/17/2012 5:30 AM
Anonymous said…
When LANS management screws up they then immediately throw their employees under the bus.

The environment at LANL has become positively poisonous of late. LANL ULM is getting very nervous.
11/17/2012 5:04 PM
Anonymous said…
Sounds like an implied threat to C. Burns! Takes guts to stand and and be counted, huh? Of course, there are to many "managers" at lanl. They are just following the dismantling scrip written a long time ago. One of the first signs is the management "bloatment". I am certain CB is standing up for LANL science, and I appreciate that. For what it's worth, LOL, go INC-4!
11/17/2012 7:11 PM
Anonymous said…
There is a BIG difference in a stand down and a stop work. Staff historically got paid during a stand down that is ordered by internal management. When the government issues a stop work order it is not so comfortable.
That being the case, ULM may order a preemptive stand down just to avoid the stop work.
11/18/2012 5:47 AM
Anonymous said…
Just got back from an LANL all-hands briefing for PADOPs led by Carl Beard. It took almost 2-hours to seat everyone in the NNSB auditorium to hear the PADOP take 5-minutes to tell us to: 1. Think Carefully, 2. Don't Take Risks, and 3. Be Conservative. Now the PADs are telling us to live by the LANS Management foundation of "do nothing". There was absolutely no substance to this "meeting", what an absolute waste of time!
11/19/2012 5:19 PM
Anonymous said…
Seems to me the LANL ULM would actually prefer some sort of "stand down". That lays the responsibility for systemic management failures on the workers. That was Nanos's trick (and think what fiasco that ended up being). The alternative is to change the contractor and kick LANS out, which is what they are really afraid of.
11/21/2012 8:14 AM
Anonymous said…
Regarding the radiologic release, it is management who must take the bulk of the blame. Management is responsible and accountable for effective policies and controls to prevent such events from happening. Ineffective controls simply reflects an ineffective management. Blaming employees dodges this crucial point. I hope the employees can get help from lawyers or policymakers to put pressure on LANS.
11/21/2012 9:09 AM
Anonymous said…
The alternative is to change the contractor and kick LANS out, which is what they are really afraid of.

November 21, 2012 8:14 AM

The next step i fixing all of these high-risk problems will be to federalize the labs, putting them under direct control of DOE or DOD. We've already got the right badges. That's what's got LLNS/LANS and their managers running scared.
11/22/2012 4:30 PM
Anonymous said…
I almost have to feel bad for McMillan. Almost. A designer not suited for a role to lead an organization with many high-hazards operations and facilities. The problem is that I'm just not sure who (in the current organization) is fit to take his spot. Maybe some of the previous suggestions of rolling large parts of the lab under DoD might make sense, and leave the rest like the science to NNSA or whatever.
11/23/2012 1:08 AM
Anonymous said…
“The next step i fixing all of these high-risk problems will be to federalize the labs, putting them under direct control of DOE or DOD. We've already got the right badges. That's what's got LLNS/LANS and their managers running scared.”

Just what America needs – more public sector union employees.
11/23/2012 3:52 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

LLNL un-diversity

By scooby
Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!
79 comments
Read more