Skip to main content

A different interpretation

Image
By scooby
Regarding employee contributions to TCP-1 being after-tax dollars: why is that? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think it makes any difference to the retirement system whether the contributions are pre- or post-tax. There must be some law somewhere that forces it to be after-tax money for LLNS, but lets it be before-tax money for UC. Can anybody out there provide an explanation (other than that Bechtel, Mother of All Evil, wants to screw us)? A pointer to the law would be especially nice.

Comments

Anonymous said…
This distinction you can blame on the IRS. They are from the government, and they are here to help you.

http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxtopics/encyclopedia/pensions.cfm
9/06/2013 7:53 PM
Anonymous said…
That being said, LLNS should use great caution when taking money - its double what they take.

Not all employees get 200K paychecks or multiple K bonuses.
9/07/2013 10:00 AM
Anonymous said…
The after tax TCP-1 confiscation of salaries for the pension is just one of many haircuts. More benefit cuts are hitting retirees in the corporate world as shown by today's WSJ article. How long until the same cuts hit the current retirees of the NNSA labs?


Citing costs, IBM to move retirees off health plan

(Wall Street Journal, Sept 7, 2013)

International Business Machines Corp. plans to move about 110,000 retirees off its company-sponsored health plan and instead give them a payment to buy coverage on a health-insurance exchange, in a sign that even big, well-capitalized employers aren't likely to keep providing the once-common benefits as medical costs continue to rise.

9/07/2013 11:03 AM
Anonymous said…
The IBM article talks about those who have reached medi-care age, 65 or older. They will be given an annual amount in a bank account to cover individual costs for medi-care. LLNS already does this.
9/07/2013 11:13 AM
Anonymous said…
LLNS already does this. (11:13 AM)

Yes, the for-profit LLCs running the NNSA labs are "ahead of the curve" on benefit reductions and salary capping, are they not?
9/08/2013 1:00 PM
Anonymous said…
Time Warner to move U.S. retirees to healthcare exchanges (Reuters - Sept 8, 2013)

Et tu, Time Warner?
9/08/2013 1:02 PM
Anonymous said…
Don't worry about it TCP-1'er UC just jacked their employee contributions to 8% so I suspect LLNS should follow UC lead as they have always done so standby for the announcement in 2014. Next will be 9% to 15% just as it was called out during the transition's 1000 questions.
9/10/2013 9:07 AM
Anonymous said…
We're already docked about 15% for our post tax contribution (vs. UC pre tax), oh wait, I thought someone actually cared or was being fair.
9/11/2013 6:23 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

LLNL un-diversity

By scooby
Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!
79 comments
Read more