Skip to main content

AKIMA layoffs

Image
By scooby
Has anyone looked into the layoff Akima has been doing for the Lab? Are they in violation of Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN)? Just curious, seems there were constant layoffs going on and they always kept the numbers low so as not to enact the above law (aka staged layoffs). No notice is given to workers on pending layoffs, you get notified the day you are laid off.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I thought there were going to be no lay-offs what so ever since the got rid of almost 400 people a few months back. Are we looking at another 400 before Christmas.
10/03/2013 4:44 AM
Anonymous said…
http://energy.gov/articles/department-energy-implementation-activities-case-lapse-appropriations
10/03/2013 5:25 AM
Anonymous said…
We are not DOE employees, we are employees of a private company - LLNS - and not covered by this DOE plan.

The LLNS President will be making the decision on what happens to LLNL employees as carryover funds in LLNS/LLNL accounts dry up.
10/03/2013 8:38 AM
Anonymous said…
Is it true some 40 NIF employees were either let go or put on the EIT list last week?
10/03/2013 9:33 AM
Anonymous said…
Is it true some 40 NIF employees were either let go or put on the EIT list last week?

October 3, 2013 at 9:33 AM


Only 360 more volunteers needed before Dec 25th.
10/03/2013 6:18 PM
Anonymous said…
I know an employee of AKIMA working in NIF as a laser technical person. He said there is no worry about his job.
10/04/2013 3:31 PM
Anonymous said…
Anonymous said...
I know an employee of AKIMA working in NIF as a laser technical person. He said there is no worry about his job.

October 4, 2013 at 3:31 PM

Special skills or new knee pads.
10/04/2013 4:21 PM
Anonymous said…
Supplemental labor is given a higher salary over his or her FTE counterpart to offset lower job stability (historically).

If LLNS FTEs are now "at will employees" with no greater job protection over supplemental labor (Akima), are FTEs due retroactive delta pay to the point of the LLNS policy change?

10/04/2013 8:40 PM
Anonymous said…
If LLNS FTEs are now "at will employees"...

October 4, 2013 at 8:40 PM

Uh, that's always been the case. You're just now realizing it?
10/04/2013 9:59 PM
Anonymous said…
Not true. Anyone LLNL FTE that has been around for a decade or more knows supplemental labor was a buffer to budget and or project fluctuations. Please read the supplemental labor policies, in particular those existing prior to November of 2012.
10/05/2013 7:56 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

LLNL un-diversity

By scooby
Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!
79 comments
Read more