Skip to main content

Sandia's Solid State Lighting EFRC

Sandia's Solid State Lighting EFRC (Energy Frontier Research Center) was up for renewal at DOE this year. This funding effort was an $18 million dollar effort with a lifespan of 5 years (2009-2014). As of June 18, 2014, it was officially announced by DOE that the EFRC renewal proposal submitted by Sandia this year was not renewed.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Who cares. Sandia will toss all these folks on the B61 LEP food line. Why do you think they call it "life extension"?
Anonymous said…
^ Sandia was trying to get OFF the B61 food line, genius. Thus the non-weapons program, a model which LLNL and LANL would be smart to adopt.
Anonymous said…
solid state lighting research is just not sexy enough.
Anonymous said…
Actually, what Sandia will do is missappropriate all of the LDRD funds to cover all of the old cruft that lost their EFRC funding, so that they don't have to make hard choices. They don't call it scientific welfare for nothing...

Meanwhile, new people with fresh ideas won't get any LDRD funding since there will be none left after the welfare is dolled out.
Anonymous said…
PNNL was able to get their EFRC renewed by the DOE...what happened to Sandia?
Anonymous said…
Hay, the NNSA has to find money to waste sinking it into NIF somewhere?

It's SOP to kill off energy research that can actually benefit mankind and sink it into welfare for physicists. Hell, one day, in the far distant future, we might need to design and build new bombs!!!!!!
Anonymous said…
At least funding wasn't sent to this silly program again:


http://llnlthetruestory.blogspot.com/2013/06/what-waste.html

" Tim Shepodd (8223) liked the moniker and agreed to call it the “chili cookoff.” But there was no chili involved, and the only “cooking” had to do with the kind of chemicals not usually found on Sandia grounds. "
Anonymous said…
Chili cookoff -- How does ULM think they can get away with this stuff?
Anonymous said…
Solid-State Lighting Science EFRC

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!