Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
Comments
I am certainly not coming here to learn English from you.
Changing the weapon lab contracts could be just another sneaky way for the NNSA to further reduce the benefits of both the current workforce and lab retirees. Don't think for a minute that the people over at DOE/NNSA haven't plotted about this as a means of changing the lab status quo.
Before you choke on your own vomit, you should read the contract transition provisions in both the NNSA/LANS and NNSA/LLNS contracts, where the "substantially equivalent" language of the original LANS/LLNS contracts is perpetuated.