Skip to main content

LANSCE “First Degree” performance failure?

Did performance failures associated with the near fatal electrical incident at LANSCE this year constitute a significant or “First Degree” performance failure with respect to the contract’s Environmental, Safety and Health terms and conditions? 

Comments

Anonymous said…
"It's the same old day-in and day-out safety and security issues at Los Alamos", Dr. Victor "Vic" Reis, former Assistant Secretary for Defense Programs, DP-1, Department of Energy, 1997
Anonymous said…
Never happened, never was said. Or else, in response to many requests and demands, this poster would have long since posted a link to a source, or at least corroboration, for the quote. He hasn't and he can't. The most he has done is say "Well, when I was there I heard him say it." Bullshit. Reis never said it, and even if somebody heard something like it in 1997, Reis was already well into the effects of his Alzheimers. No credible claim there.
Anonymous said…
I know him well. He never said such a thing. The reason is simple, he's an honest man and it isn't true.
Anonymous said…
Answer to the OP: yes.

But, we must wait a few more weeks to see if NNSA has the courage to do the right thing about it.
Anonymous said…
NNSA? Courage? LOL
Anonymous said…
I know him well. He never said such a thing. The reason is simple, he's an honest man and it isn't true.

October 31, 2015 at 1:55 AM

Wasn't Reis being honest telling the Science and Engineering Advisory Board in 1997 "that it's the same old day-in and day-out safety and security issues at Los Alamos"? It's ok, it's still true today.
Anonymous said…
Wasn't Reis being honest telling the Science and Engineering Advisory Board in 1997...

November 6, 2015 at 4:57 AM

Everyone keeps asking you to produce a written record of such a statement, but apparently citing a reference for a dubious claim is beyond you.
Anonymous said…
Anonymous Anonymous said...
"It's the same old day-in and day-out safety and security issues at Los Alamos", Dr. Victor "Vic" Reis, former Assistant Secretary for Defense Programs, DP-1, Department of Energy, 1997

October 30, 2015 at 8:42 PM

Brought to you by the Joseph Goebbels of the blogosphere. (If you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it)
Anonymous said…
"It's the same old day-in and day-out safety and security issues at Los Alamos", Dr. Victor "Vic" Reis, former Assistant Secretary for Defense Programs, DP-1, Department of Energy, 1997"

It is all I have, so I am going with it. The world revolves around me, I am special, LANL is bad since it did not recognize me for the genius or the unique snowflake that I am. The world also is bad. I have no idea who Reis is or what he said but I need to some hope that someone else out there hates LANL is much as I do, so I will repeat this lie over and over again.
Anonymous said…
I don't know any Vic Reis, but there is a Dan Rees at LANSCE who is a group lead and the biggest waste of space I have ever seen. Typical Day, DR shows up to work at 8am, spends the next couple of hours attending useless meetings so he can hear himself speak with intent so that he may convince himself he is the genius LANL should never misunderstand. Come 11am so begins DR's two hour lunch break by which you can set your watch. The patented lunch break includes a run with division lead ,where ritual ass kissing and good old boy networking are elevated to a blatant art form, a shower and a trip home for lunch. Comes 1pm our hero returns to his desk and begins typing busily to subordinates their need to be current on training they will never need followed by more meetings. Finally after this long and arduous day our hero leaves for home at 4:30pm putting in a very hard 6.5 hrs of work serving his country while blasting subordinates for being lazy government workers. I don't know if this happens at LLNL but I have seen this crap up close and personal at LANL. Its sad and to the detriment of this country.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!