Saturday, December 19, 2015
6 comments:
-
Anonymous said...
-
Moses would be perfect. He wanted Parney's job so badly, you could taste the bitterness at his all-hands meetings. He would be ideal running LANL, as a no-nonsense leader who hates scientists and would fire everyone up-top and replace them with his hand-picked sycophants. There would never be another safety or security incident at LANL, ever, problem solved.
-
12/19/2015 3:04 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
Federalize the nuclear weapon complex.
-
12/19/2015 7:45 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
Well they just brought in wife of security division leader to head up QA. Only qualification! She has zilch background. So replace Charlie with ummm, errrr, I know how about Oprah?
-
12/22/2015 1:26 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
Charlie with ummm, errrr, I know how about Oprah?
Oprah would be better. -
12/23/2015 9:49 AM
-
Anonymous said...
-
The LANS BOG isn't going to waste its time searching for a new director with less than two years left before they are toast. Charlie will ride the dead horse to the bitter end. (Following the money all the way!)So long, suckaaahs!
-
12/28/2015 8:25 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
From all indications, 8:25 has cracked the code. UC has given indications that they are done with LANL forever, and have no intrest in being part of any contract there in the future. In which case, they will keep Charlie and the PADs until the final day.
On the other hand, if they have any desire to remain involved at LANL, the best path forward would be a total dump of the present team, and then bring in an outside Lab Director. -
12/29/2015 8:30 AM
Since the lowest score in the evaluation was for leadership, who will be brought in from outside LANL to replace Charlie?
Just more Livermore losers. We are so tired of hearing "at Livermore, at Livermore,..." at Los Alamos.