Blog purpose
This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA.
The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore,
The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them.
Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted.
Blog author serves as a moderator.
For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com
Blog rules
- Stay on topic.
- No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
- NO NAME CALLING.
- No political debate.
- Posts and comments are posted several times a day.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days
-
So what do the NNSA labs do under the the 2nd Trump administration ? What are the odds we will have a test?
-
Do you remember how hard it was to get a Q clearance? You needed a good reputation, good credit and you couldn't lie about anything. We...
-
The end of LANL and LLNL? "After host Maria Bartiromo questioned whether the two plan to “close down entire agencies,” Ramaswamy said...
9 comments:
The amount of the increase is also dependent on when you retired.
9:24 How does that work? For example I retired in 2006.
You ask how it works, who knows. Bean counters in the back figuring out things with ouija boards, tea leaves and actuarial tables.
Here's a link for the 2015 COLA announcment:
http://ucnet.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/2015/04/ucrp-benefits-recipients-to-receive-cost-of-living-adjustment.html
For those not willing to got to the link here's the salient information for the 2015 COLA:
Retirement Date COLA
On or before July 1, 2006 2.00%
July 2, 2006 – July 1, 2009 1.33%
July 2, 2009 – July 1, 2010 1.69%
July 2, 2010 – July 1, 2011 1.70%
July 2, 2011 – July 1, 2014 1.33%
I do not see a listing yet for 2016, but the announcement for 2015 was done on April 20th, so give it another week or so and Google ucrp cola 2016 and see what hits you get.
Thats ucrp. Tcp1 is different. Even though the minimum formula is the same for both. From memory:
If Cpi-u avg 0-2% full year increase is cpi-u avg
If Cpi-u avg 2%- 4%. 0 additional added above upper number.
If Cpi-u > 4% increase 1/2 (cpi-u - 4%) to 2% above.
It is effective in August pension payment. It is prorated in tcp1 for partial years. Ucrs may be different.
For the feb to feb year over year average of la and sfo cpi-u.
Also occasion adjustments are made periodically to bring segments closer to cpi.
stments
Here it is, the Cola for 2016
The July 1, 2016 COLA rates for UCRP and UC-PERS Plus 5 benefit recipients, including those receiving survivor and UCRP disability income, will be as follows:
Retirement Date COLA
On or before July 1, 2006 2.00%
July 2, 2006 – July 1, 2008 2.72%
July 2, 2008 – July 1, 2009 2.69%
July 2, 2009 – July 1, 2010 2.31%
July 2, 2010 – July 1, 2011 2.30%
July 2, 2011 – July 1, 2013 2.72%
July 2, 2013 – July 1, 2014 2.67%
July 2, 2014 – July 1, 2015 2.00%
It was another joy to see your post. It is such an important topic and ignored by so many, even professionals. I thank you to help making people more aware of possible issues. Great stuff as usual...
security guard service
So would the COLA for TCP1 retirees be the same as UCRP given the same retirement date ?
Again from memory, in years past the announced adjustments between UCRS and LLNL Tcp1 hss been slightly different,.. again giving lie to the ignominious Tyler Pryzbylek's soporific "assurance", "Substantially equivalent".
Both use the same basic yearly adjustment formula, but the additional recovery, in every cohort above the amount over 2%, appears to be a judgement call.
Be hopeful.
What? Tyler lied? Who knew?
Post a Comment