LLNS may have excluded the wrong people in last VSSOP? The exclusions were based on outdated job categories and related skills. ULM are now thinking that in the future, job categories and functional areas will have to be re-defined. The next VSSOP/ISP will be based on the new categories and functional areas. The questions I have are: 1) Why didnt they think of that before the transition. It seems like their style is “change things as you go”. Planning is out the window! 2) Who will give input on the new changes? The next RIF apparently is going to be more lucrative than the VSSOP. Depending on the length of employment, a RIFed person, not only gets their 1 week pay per year of service but also from 30 to 120 days notice, essentially 30 to 120 days pay. Please feel free to comment on the rumors or add new ones you actually heard.
Comments
She can also say the magic wprd "sorry, i didn't know".
April 23, 2016 at 7:29 PM"
No, she would have to invade a country, kill hundreds of thousands of that countries civilians, sacrifice the lives of thousands of U.S. soldiers based on faulty and misrepresented intelligence.
In your world, that would then qualify her.
Well...yeah. And?
Please, post facts not conjecture masquerading as fact.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/federal-prosecutors-in-virginia-assisting-in-clinton-email-probe/2016/05/05/f0277faa-12f0-11e6-81b4-581a5c4c42df_story.html
One of the greatest failings of the left wing is "magical thinking;" believing that something is true because you want it to be true. Demanding facts while ignoring them is a major symptom of the disease.
I am not going to recite the law for you. You need to take responsibility and determine for yourself what the law says. I have availed myself of that opportunity and clearly you haven't. Your ignorance is glaring.
The "IC" requested State classify emails and they agreed.At the time those emails were generated they were not classified. That is all we and you know.
Please quit making up "facts"
MESA monkeys can only carry you so far
May 6, 2016 at 5:25 PM
No, it was MARKED AND PROTECTED as classified after the fact. The fact that you don't know the difference says it all about your complete lack of knowledge about the subject. If you work at one of the national laboratories, go ask your Classification Officer. He/She will inform you of your ignorance.
I have not seen the evidence that demonstrates that is what has happened in the Clinton case. Can you supply a link?
May 8, 2016 at 8:37 AM
Right. Like information confirming a specific compromise of classified information would be made public. That information is also classified.