Skip to main content

LANL cannot keep up

LANL can not keep schedule nation needs for pit production.


http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-16-585

Comments

Anonymous said…
They never could keep up and never will. Continue to rest on the accomplishments of years gone by. Upgrade LLNL to Cat I and let the horses run!
Anonymous said…
Upgrade LLNL to Cat I and let the horses run!


I don't disagree with your first point but you have to be realistic, LLNL will never
be upgraded to Cat 1 and even if it was it would not be able to keep up any better than LANL.
Anonymous said…
Perhaps LLNL can retrofit NIF into a pit production facility. I am sure that there will be a push to recast the 60% complete MOX facility into a pit production facility and try to save the billions spent there. We should expect that would cost tens of billions of dollars to rebuild and as much to operate annually. Alas, the DOE and the NNSA no longer has the capacity to push through a new plutonium facility, no matter where and no matter if it's needed or not!
Anonymous said…
Before any more money is wasted on expensive research and position papers for the pit subject, the US needs to firmly decide exactly how many pits are going to actually be needed each year. The figures are all over the place.

Once the matter of the number of pits is determine, then it will be time to proceed on deciding how to get there.
Anonymous said…
If you have no idea where you are going, any path will do.
Anonymous said…
There are already cat 1 facilities in cold standby at other locations. Use those as the structure to put pit processing in.
Anonymous said…
Alas, the DOE and the NNSA no longer has the capacity to push through a new plutonium facility, no matter where and no matter if it's needed or not!

August 20, 2016 at 7:51 PM

DOE and NNSA haven't got what it takes to push through any kind of facility. And, even if by some miracle they did, they could not possibly select a competent operator to run it. DOE has long outlived its usefulness to the country, and should be disbanded. The NNSA should simply be dumped and the Feds working there fired. A return to the AEC is the only way to save the stockpile.
Anonymous said…
7:51, spot on.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

tcp1 looking good

I just received my annual TCP-1 letter from LLNS and a summary of the LLNS Pension Plan. Looked in pretty good shape in 2013. About 35% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 134.92%). This was a decrease from 2012 where it was 51% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 151.59%). They did note that the 2012 change in the law on how liabilities are calculated using interest rates improved the plan's position. Without the change the funding target attainment percentages would have been 118% (2012) and 105% (2013). 2013 assets = $2,057,866,902 2013 liabilities = $1,525,162,784 vs 2012 assets = $1,844,924,947 2012 liabilities = $1,217,043,150 It was also noted that a slightly different calculation method ("fair market value") designed to show a clearer picture of the plan' status as December 31, 2013 had; Assets = $2,403,098,433 Liabilities = $2,068,984,256 Funding ratio = 116.15% Its a closed plan with 3,781 participants. Of that number, 3,151 wer...