Skip to main content

Lab cell phones

Did I miss something? I see more and more people using their lab issued phones as personal phones. I was under the impression that these phones are for business purposes only and personal use was limited to incidental use. 

I would assume these phones are capable of being monitored and it would be easy to when and where these phones are being used. 

Seems like a waste of tax payer money to supply these phones for business purposes only to have them being used for personal purposes

Comments

Anonymous said…
Other sites are flipping this around and offering stipends to employees to use their personal phones instead of issuing government phones. The difference is no sensitive info allowed. But why would you want to has sensitive info on a mobile device anyways.
Anonymous said…
I would assume these phones are capable of being monitored and it would be easy to when and where these phones are being used.


Good grief, another half witted "save the taxpayer" comment. By the time you pay the persons who check that the cell phone rules have been followed, you spent a lot more.
Kind of: pay a dollar to save a nickel. This is exactly the reason, why our overhead is so huge. We are constantly hiring people to monitor everyone else. Welcome to the USSR. 3 minders for one worker.
Anonymous said…
Spot on 7:27
Anonymous said…
This brought back a memory when I was a lab manager and had to "certify" each month that the phone bill for 30 employes was comprised of calls for official business only and did mot contain any personal calls. So every month I would gather the employees for a monthly meeting to cover various topics and at the end would ask "did anyone have any personal calls last month" and nary a hand was raised. So that was my solution in lieu of reviewing a couple hundred pages of phone calls to ferret out personal calls.

: )

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!