The suits are already piling up and the courts have not yet ruled on Liedos NNSS protest. Looks like the contract losers from NSTec have turned the lawyers loose on the NNSA.
http://www.bizjournals.com/washington/news/2016/09/21/contractor-teams-seek-to-challenge-leidos-nuclear.html
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
LLNS Contract discussion
SUGGEST NEW TOPICS HERE
Submit candidates for new topics here only. Stay on topic with National Labs' related issues. All submissions are screened first for ...
-
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will have a huge negative effect on the ...
-
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises t...
-
From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref...
7 comments:
Of course. They have a war chest of money they saved up by not paying their employees decent wages.
Looks like the contract losers from NSTec have turned the lawyers loose on the NNSA.
NNSA is gonna fight this to the bitter end, they have to since there is more at stake here than the NSTC. What is at stake is the value of having NNSA, and they know that so they do what they need to do to win.
If NNSA claims are correct and documented, I don't see a fight. The bid language either did or did not state that NNSA must be notified in case of a transfer of ownership, and Lockheed either did or did not notify NNSA. There is nothing else to battle about, and the documentation is what the courts will look at.
September 27, 2016 at 9:34 PM
You are way too logical and fact-based for this blog. But thanks.
The battle will be in a different court, when Leidos sues Lockheed for selling them a worthless legal entity.
September 27, 2016 at 9:34 PM
Your opinion is not supported by the preponderance of the case law on this topic.
Your opinion is not supported by the preponderance of the case law on this topic.
September 28, 2016 at 11:24 AM
The 9:34 PM poster sounds correct to me.
Post a Comment