Skip to main content

Why Are More Cleared Candidates Job Hopping?



https://news.clearancejobs.com/2016/09/08/cleared-candidates-job-hopping/?utm_campaign=Defense+Industry+Report&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=34332969&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-8g813hybHLU5fYmx2VXHs1_IpoRN7Y2YlmuVdOdK-kEa1aBZFwdrmH2FIHRU1UjCYwdJpl5SIPvjfhBw3gXjYtHPXAC5gU1pV8FOjspmmhEXPJ4Ew&_hsmi=34332442

Comments

Anonymous said…
It's not really a secret. Jobs these days (private or government) don't provide pensions, pay raises, promotions or a great deal of security. Meanwhile, housing costs continue to spiral out of control in most cities. The only way to keep your head above water is to constantly search for a role with more pay.
Anonymous said…
Certainly the case that those of us that started work in the late 70's, 80's, early 90's would have stayed in place, for the most part. Even with moderate salaries and the high interest rates (12 to 15 %) in the early 80's we could still manage to buy a home, with a lot of belt tightening.

Part of the problem today (my observation) is that millennials are spoiled, will not cut back spending, and must buy that new $35K+ vehicle and 2500+ sq ft home. Why brew your own coffee and pack a lunch when you can spend $15/day at Starbucks and $15/day for lunch and treats. Enough to cover the PG&E, water and cable/internet/phone bill.

Incidentally, you don't keep your clearance when you leave government for the private sector. So I think the title of this post is very misleading.
Anonymous said…
Incidentally, you don't keep your clearance when you leave government for the private sector.

October 3, 2016 at 10:59 PM

Unless you work in the local oversight office for DOE, you are not a government employee. If you work at the Laboratory, you are a private sector contractor employed by LLNS. Why is this so difficult to understand?
Anonymous said…
If you are a government contractor, you are paid with taxpayer money. That is not the "private sector." Why is this so difficult to understand?
Anonymous said…
Lockheed-Martin is one of the largest government contractors, and their employees are most assuredly private sector. It is a public stock, openly traded, and not owned by the government.

Someone needs a refresher course in government ownership of companies, as in the Soviet era Eastern Bloc.
Anonymous said…
If you work for LM *at Sandia* then you are paid with US government funds, and that employment is not "private sector." Sandia employees are not routinely give opportunities to go work for corporate LM. LLNS/LANS have no existence outside the LLNL/LANL contracts. They will disappear as will their NOT "private sector" employees when the contracts end.
Anonymous said…
Nevertheless, clearances are not transferrable.

Of course, now that the OMB has been hacked by foreign actors (Chinese ?) all our clearance and family contact info might be put up for sale on the black web.

Pleasant thought !
Anonymous said…
Of course, now that the OMB has been hacked by foreign actors (Chinese ?) all our clearance and family contact info might be put up for sale on the black web.

October 4, 2016 at 9:37 PM

How do you know that's not already happened? The Federal Agencies (NNSA, OPM, etc.) are strangely quiet about how many of these employees have already had their identities compromised or screwed up by the information that was stolen.
Anonymous said…
The Federal Agencies (NNSA, OPM, etc.) are strangely quiet about how many of these employees have already had their identities compromised or screwed up by the information that was stolen.

October 5, 2016 at 11:21 AM

Not so. All potentially affected current and former employees have been contacted and offered free perpetual identity theft protection through a private firm hired by the government. I gratefully accepted and have been happy with the monthly updates.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!