Climate change

1. During this new Administration.
   
   In retrospect,
   a majority believes in some type of Climate Change.
   
   I am not sure a majority believe it is man made or if it then is mankind has a small, small part in Climate Change. Yes the media and Academia would say they have a majority and also that Hillary was up 10 points! So don't believe them.
   
   So again in retrospect Climate Change has been rammed down America's throat (very similar to Obamacare being rammed through) and at the cost of midwest JOBS.
   
   So the point is (in retrospect) if there was a softer and more moderate approach to Climate Change and trying to get some agreement then now during another Administration there might be more agreement and more would get done.
   
   But no, not only was Climate Change rammed down our throat (America) if anyone disagreed (like on this Blog) "Oh THEY ARE CLIMATE DENIERS"
   
   So now people like me are saying it is unproductive to continue a large effort toward this (like Paris Accord).
   I would not being saying that if Progressives were not forcing me to believe this.
   
   Please stop telling me what to think!
   
   In all honesty
   what really didn't help your cause was Democrats making it into a money making machine like Al Gore. I agree President Obama was more sincere.
   
   This also all applies to renewable energy. The huge failures of Solyndra and others and standing by and watch President Obama just throwing money in this area and it looked like he was just wasting Billions of dollars (although sincere).
   
   A more Moderate effort and a slower Progressive agenda may have brought people like me into the cause but I do not see Progressives and Progressive leaders taking ANY responsibility for failure of any kind.
   
   I would add one last point to the above about taking responsibility.
   Ash Carter sent Classified emails on his phone. The next day he apologized, said he was wrong and would not do it again.
   It never became an issue. You never heard about it again.
   
   So in the future consider not calling me a Climate Denier and I will respect your different belief and try to work with you.
   
   I just am not bought into the man made part after seeing how big this Earth is.
   Am I allowed to think that or does that mean I am a bad person?

   ReplyDelete
2. 
   AnonymousDecember 18, 2016 at 8:59 AM

   Democrats miss the point. A majority doesn't give two shakes about climate change, they just want to stop their jobs leaving for Mexico and China. That's why climate change worry is a rich, inner city liberal concern. You have to be able to put food on the table before you worry about 1.0 deg C in 35 years.

   ReplyDelete
3. 
   AnonymousDecember 18, 2016 at 9:08 AM

   If the climate change issue is about facts and evidence (from both sides of the argument) then it is science, and like any important scientific question should be pursued vigorously. If it is about belief, it is religion, and like any annoying proselytizing, should be ignored. And someone please inform the politicians and the press that there is no such thing as "settled science."