-
AnonymousDecember 10, 2016 at 3:13 PMAnyone who has worked with IC types knows they're compulsive liars and scumbags.
This is just John Brennan getting back at Trump.
Trump just laughed this off, as he should.
They days of the IC manupulating our leaders is over. These departments are now going to run by generals who have no patience for this nonsense. Intelligence is something to be used by the war fighter, not a means to allow the IC to control and manipulate our leaders and institutions, including the media. -
AnonymousDecember 10, 2016 at 8:14 PMThese departments are now going to run by generals who have no patience for this nonsense.
December 10, 2016 at 3:13 PM
Uh, perhaps you are forgetting General Michael Hayden, former CIA and NSA director? Sorta shoots your theory, huh? -
AnonymousDecember 10, 2016 at 9:17 PMHayden, who is an idiot, was Air Force intelligence. Also not an Academy Graduate. Went to a second rate school in PA with ROTC. The new director Pompeo is a West Point Grad who served in the cavalry. Don't confuse IC people with military rank with actual soldiers.
-
AnonymousDecember 10, 2016 at 11:20 PMThe new director Pompeo is a West Point Grad who served in the cavalry
Cavalry, what is this 1880, if there is one place to cut it would be the cavalry. Maybe they put the losers into cavalry since they figure they can't hurt to many people with a horse. -
AnonymousDecember 11, 2016 at 5:32 AMSorry, it was the Armor Branch Cavalry. Tanks and stuff.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Pompeo
Tuesday, December 13, 2016
To Russia with Love....
5 comments:
-
Anonymous said...
-
Strange that Clinton and Podesta did not refute one item from the 30-odd Chapters of WikiLeaks from the leaked DNC and Podesta emails. Not one refutation !
Citizens looked at the WikiLeaks documents concluded that the Clintons (Bill and Hillary, but not Chelsea) are the most corrupt politicians in American history. They sold us out to the Russians !
Yes that cost her some votes !
What goes around comes around Podesta, you lying basta... -
12/14/2016 9:01 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
This is a place of fog, manipulation, deceit, hacks, wire taps, false flags, Zimmerman Letters, of honey traps, snd silencers, of polonium injectors and letter drops, and state craft of Dulles, Bill Casey, Wild Bill Donavan, Bay of Pigs, overthrowing Mossadek, Gary Powers, Kim Philby and Iran- and contra-gates, of Bolton and no WMD. It is a very important ear and oracle. But at its core, it is a House of Dark Arts. A House of Lies. Verify.
-
12/16/2016 7:54 AM
-
Anonymous said...
-
It's atmosphere is secrecy, and evil resides there.
-
12/16/2016 8:00 AM
-
Anonymous said...
-
Is Russia the "House of Dark Arts". I would say it's the DNC really ! Poor Bernie. Screwed from the "get go".
-
12/16/2016 4:59 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
Paranoia strikes deep
Into your life it will creep
It starts when you're always afraid
Step out of line, the men come and take you away...
Dems in the Trump era.
You have to love it.
-
12/16/2016 7:01 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
------
Secret CIA assessment says Russia was trying to help Trump win White House
Washington Post
December 9
The CIA has concluded in a secret assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump win the presidency, rather than just to undermine confidence in the U.S. electoral system, according to officials briefed on the matter.
Intelligence agencies have identified individuals with connections to the Russian government who provided WikiLeaks with thousands of hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee and others, including Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, according to U.S. officials. Those officials described the individuals as actors known to the intelligence community and part of a wider Russian operation to boost Trump and hurt Clinton’s chances.
“It is the assessment of the intelligence community that Russia’s goal here was to favor one candidate over the other, to help Trump get elected,” said a senior U.S. official briefed on an intelligence presentation made to U.S. senators. “That’s the consensus view.”