Senator asks NNSA about PF-4 operational status and requests clarity on who paid for 3+ year stand down of work.
Good luck in getting the M&O contractor to pay for their screwups!
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3912784-2017-08-03-CMC-Ltr-to-NNSA-Re-Safety-Violations.htmlhttps://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3912784-2017-08-03-CMC-Ltr-to-NNSA-Re-Safety-Violations.html
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
LLNS Contract discussion
SUGGEST NEW TOPICS HERE
Submit candidates for new topics here only. Stay on topic with National Labs' related issues. All submissions are screened first for ...
-
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises t...
-
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will have a huge negative effect on the ...
-
From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref...
2 comments:
Not operating PF-4 is a National disgrace for the incumbent M&O and that probably is why the draft RFP was so blunt in setting it up that any of the current institutional partners in LANS and any of the current key personnel in LANS will have a very substantial negative penalty assigned to them should some new team attempt to include them on a rebid effort. Among the long list of failures of LANS this one seems to have had the most significant impact on how NNSA has structured the new contract competition.
PF-4 needed to be shutdown.
Post a Comment