Skip to main content

Steve Younger

For all the rumormongering that went on when he was named Lab Director, by all accounts Steve Younger and his team have done a good job of transitioning SNL leadership. Their model of full housecleaning of the previous L-M managers above the GL level looks to have been what was desired by NNSA. Anyone want to wager if Younger is making a behind the scene effort to duplicate the win at LANL?

Comments

Anonymous said…
Explains why Younger hired Steve "Rambo" Girrens. I think Younger always was jealous of Girrens hateful but deceptive attitude toward employees. So he hired him.
Anonymous said…
Younger is no friend of UC, and was the leader of the opposition bid team for running LLNL. Would not at all find it out of character for him to be looking to even the score.
Anonymous said…
Younger has Burns and Girrens with him to be the hatchet men and each of them look to enjoy the role.
Anonymous said…
I think Oppenheimer himself could come back to run the labs and people would hate him on this blog.
Anonymous said…
Younger knows the SNL mission space well and finished very close behind Hommert to succeed Hunter as Laboratories Director. Expect him to be most successful in the role and lead the organization to serve the Nation's needs.
Anonymous said…
How do you Sandians like Rambo (i.e. Girrens) ? This guy is bad news to the bone. He will hug and embrace you when he first meets you, give his sincere bullshit and then screw you over when he feels like. He screwed many folks over at LANL. He doesn't like anyone that knows more than him. BAD NEWS!
Anonymous said…
Younger knows the SNL mission space well and finished very close behind Hommert to succeed Hunter as Laboratories Director. Expect him to be most successful in the role and lead the organization to serve the Nation's needs.

August 19, 2017 at 7:18 AM


Of the 3 Lab directors now, Steve is the only one with credibility in Washington. In the wild West of the political arena, he is expected to do very well for SNL.
Anonymous said…
Sandia has always done well inside the beltway, largely because of their culture of customer focus, as well as their overwhelming presence there.
Anonymous said…
Sandia does well because their mission more closely aligns with weapons production which is the focus of the NNSA.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Rumor corner

LLNS may have excluded the wrong people in last VSSOP? The exclusions were based on outdated job categories and related skills. ULM are now thinking that in the future, job categories and functional areas will have to be re-defined. The next VSSOP/ISP will be based on the new categories and functional areas. The questions I have are: 1) Why didnt they think of that before the transition. It seems like their style is “change things as you go”. Planning is out the window! 2) Who will give input on the new changes? The next RIF apparently is going to be more lucrative than the VSSOP. Depending on the length of employment, a RIFed person, not only gets their 1 week pay per year of service but also from 30 to 120 days notice, essentially 30 to 120 days pay. Please feel free to comment on the rumors or add new ones you actually heard.