Skip to main content

Queen Tauscher - Good, Bad, or Ugly?

The appointment of Ellen Tauscher as an Executive Committee Governor of the Boards of Governors of the Los Alamos National Security, LLC and Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, effective February 16, 2018, replacing Norman Pattiz, be approved.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Ellen is impressive, savvy and well connected.
Anonymous said…
Ha, what a joke. She is a Hillary sycophant, an anti stockpile unilateral disarmament through complex distraction kook, and she is quite ugly.
Anonymous said…
She's a savvy political player. Her career took a hit when she was diagnosed with cancer and since winning that battle she's been parlaying her past political clout into opportunities to rake in the dough. When she went to congress covering the district that LLNL was in, she made the usual I support you statements to get in and then showed her true colors. What side is she on? - Hers.
Anonymous said…
8:42 ---
Wow! The misogyny runs deep with you!
Anonymous said…
Yep, any opposition to a woman is misogyny.
Anonymous said…
Nope, it's the "and she is quite ugly" part.

Anonymous said…
Did you note the question posed in the post title?
Anonymous said…
Don't use facts. It annoys liberals.
Anonymous said…
The only "fact" revealed by the post title is that Scooby and Evil are also misogynistic jerks. Do you always feel compelled to seriously answer offensive questions?
GreggS said…
September 22, 2017 at 8:06 AM

I strongly suggest you take time studying the dictionary and learn the true meaning of those big words you sling about carelessly. Just because someone has differing opinions does not entitle you to brand them as bigots.

Locking this thread....

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!