NNSA Could Do With Less Semiautonomy, DOE No. 2 Tells Congress
https://www.exchangemonitor.com/nnsa-less-semi-autonomy-doe-no-2-tells-congress/
https://www.exchangemonitor.com/nnsa-less-semi-autonomy-doe-no-2-tells-congress/
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
Comments
Those offices respectively serve as the NNSA’s main congressional liaison and top legal representation. They also, at least in Brouillette’s mind, duplicate functions of identically titled offices higher up the DOE chain of command in the Office of the Secretary.
“I am hard-pressed to make the argument for separate offices in separate parts of the building that are doing essentially the same function,” Brouillette said during the hearing of the House Energy and Commerce energy subcommittee."
But it creates more high paying jobs of people that do nothing and add nothing. I thought that whole point of NNSA?