Skip to main content

Regional Coalition of LANL Communities’ use of public funds flagged



http://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/local_news/regional-coalition-of-lanl-communities-use-of-public-funds-flagged/article_b4f59a44-9440-595f-87fa-c64187479eca.html

Comments

Anonymous said…
so, what do we have here? The DOE funds, to the tune of 100K per year, an organization called "regional coalition of LANL communities" with an annual budget of 212K. The executive director salary consumes 2/3 of this budget. This organization leads the lobbying effort for the state of New Mexico to tax nonprofit operators of Los Alamos National Laboratory. In the midst of a contract competition run by the DOE, no less. The DOE then pays 100M to the state of New Mexico in gross receipt tax...

I see trees of green, red roses too
I see them bloom for me and you
And I think to myself what a wonderful world
Anonymous said…

"four Birra Moretti beers that cost $8"


Dang, 8 bucks will get a six pack of this cheap Italian beer. What a crime.

Seems like some people has been having some issues with travel reimbursements .
Anonymous said…
Northern NM politicians = corruption. No surprise here.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!