Friday, June 15, 2018

Censorship

Scooby has lately been relentless in his censorship of posts he does not like. Don't bash Bechtel or the Bechtel lover here. Don't opine that no one wanted a for-profit contractor to win or that LA county lobbied NNSA for a for-profit contractor, and is now lobbying NM State Legislature to let non-profits (not all, but only this one!!) to be taxed as for-profits.

BTW, why are there so few active posts lately? Too much work for the moderator?

6 comments:

scooby said...

Hey buddy! I am neutral .I dont care if you love or hate Bechtel as long as your comment/post is compliant with the rules.
I make sure the content here is clean (no expletives, name calling etc. ..)
I dont control how many posts come in and yes it is a lot if work to moderate . Would you like to help?
Didn't think so!
So stop complaining and feel free to stay away. It won't hurt my feelings !

Anonymous said...

You most certainly do not just enforce the rules. You've censured several of my posts that broke no rules while you often let rule infractions through. You've routinely allowed others to post insults and baiting language. Just recently, you allowed someone to post "STFU". I happen to wholeheartedly agree with that post and I feel the language was appropriate for the message, but it still violates the rules. Are you going to claim you don't know what STFU means?

Anonymous said...


Lets put you assertion to the test.

>Scooby has lately been relentless in his censorship of posts he does not like. Don't bash Bechtel

Bechtel sucks


>or the Bechtel lover here.

The Bechtel lover sucks.


>Don't opine that no one wanted a for-profit contractor to win

I cannot think of anyone who wanted a for-profit contractor other that the town council, but you cannot blame them it is like saying a addict should not like drugs.

> or that LA county lobbied NNSA for a for-profit contractor,

I though there was a whole post on this back when they sent in their feedback. I for one made fun of some the reasons, like this would help the lab.

>and is now lobbying NM State Legislature to let non-profits (not all, but only this one!!) to be taxed as for-profits.

I though they tried this and Susana Martinez vetoed it. I mean if this thing went through it would have all sorts of crazy implications. You could start taxing churches or charity groups or whatever.

Ok according to you Scooby will never post this. If this happens I will admit you are right, unfortunately I would have to post this admission on this blog but Scooby probably would not post that either at least according to you.

Anonymous said...

Scooby is providing a service to lab employees and lab retirees. You may start your own blog if you wish.

scooby said...

Even pitted dates occasionally have a pit fragment. My process is not foolproof and relies on a traditional method called reading .If you focus one one tree in the forest, what happens? Correct ! You miss the forest. I will not publish any further trivial complaint from,unless it is a different topic.

scooby said...

Thank you !

LLNS Contract discussion

SUGGEST NEW TOPICS HERE

Submit candidates for new topics here only. Stay on topic with National Labs' related issues. All submissions are screened first for ...