LLNL is at it again with hydrogen:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/16/science/metallic-hydrogen-lasers.html
They “re-analyze” Sandia data so it agrees with the NIF data, an interesting move that the Sandia people don’t agree with, according to the NYT article.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/16/science/metallic-hydrogen-lasers.html
They “re-analyze” Sandia data so it agrees with the NIF data, an interesting move that the Sandia people don’t agree with, according to the NYT article.
Comments