Skip to main content

DOE kills contract

DOE and Trump administration gives up on MOX, plans further WIPP internment of waste:

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-plutonium-mox/trump-administration-kills-contract-for-plutonium-to-fuel-plant-idUSKCN1MM2N0

Comments

Anonymous said…
LANL win again!!!!!!!

Hell ya, cowboys pull through as they always do, UC knows how to do it!.
Anonymous said…
So here is what is not in this article. First, we understand that Lyndsey Graham is meeting with the President this week to specifically discuss the MOX plant. Yes he is still arguing to complete it. Second, it has been communicated that the “bait-and-switch” plans of the NNSA to build pits in the unfinished MOX plant has tripled in cost. The new number is amazing close to the actual costs to finish the MOX plant. And third, the Pu sustainment budget at Los Alamos was reduced by $100 million dollars to send that money to Savannah River. The ability to make 30, 50, or even 80 pits per year, as mandated by Congress in 2030 just became yet another pipe dream. Wait until the New Mexico Congressional delegation finds out about that while the planning to dump 34 metric tons of good weapons grade plutonium into WIPP heats up...

What is NNSA smoking since marajuana became legal in DC?
Anonymous said…
The prospect of dumping over 34 metric tons of plutonium into WIPP should concern all New Mexicans. That is NOT what WIPP was designed for. That is not what WIPP was permitted for. That is not what WIPP was sold as when the people of New Mexico agreed to take. And yet, the senator from South Carolina laments about the termination of MOX and demands that the plutonium be removed from his state. Somehow, Savannah River still gets over $200 million a year to safely store the plutonium, is demanding jobs for a site that should be shut down, and is now trying to take jobs away from New Mexico.
Anonymous said…
Another billions of dollars wasted by the DOE. The most wasteful government agency per capita

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!