Skip to main content

LLNL/DTED-NSED

At LLNL, will DTED completely swallow up NSED?

Comments

Anonymous said…
Much of the DTED takeover occurred under Monya's leadership.
Anonymous said…
Was she the first Engineering AD with only a BS from San Jose State?
Anonymous said…
Way to many super successful BS and non-degreed engineers to name. Start with founders Brobeck, Hurley and move through lab history. One even moved on to be Director of LANL...
Anonymous said…
"Way to many super successful BS and non-degreed engineers to name..."

As important as it is, diversity efforts aren't meant to leapfrog a BS or a non-degreed into a PhD arena, and just hope for the best. Your opinions of exceptions don't nullify the rule.

There is career success and there is scientific and engineering success. Sometimes career success comes at the expense of scientific and engineering success, and there are way too many to name.

There are reasonable diversity efforts and there are underutilization driven turbocharged diversity efforts with long lasting negative programmatic results. This gives broader diversity efforts an undeserved bad name.
Anonymous said…
7/10/2019 9:43 AM

Spoken as a under-recognized Ph.D. staff member with a grudge, but also probably correct.
Anonymous said…
" One even moved on to be Director of LANL...

7/09/2019 9:39 PM"

????

Which one would that be since every single Director has a doctorate. You seem a bit confused. Look having a Phd is not a required for doing great science or engineering can be seen be easily seen by number of Nobel prizes given to be people without Phds include some within the last 30 years. However you are wrong about the LANL Directors.

Thomas Mason (November 2018-present)
Terry C. Wallace, Jr. (2018)
Charles McMillan (2011–2017)
Michael R. Anastasio (2006–2011)
Robert Kuckuck (2005–2006)
G. Peter Nanos (2003–2005)
John C. Browne (1997–2003)
Siegfried S. Hecker (1985–1997)
Donald M. Kerr (1979–1985)
Harold M. Agnew (1970–1979)
Norris Bradbury (1945–1970)
J. Robert Oppenheimer (1943–1945)
Anonymous said…
Mr. "Phd" strikes again. Why is it you are unable to bring yourself to use the correct "Ph.D." which you probably don't know stands for "Doctor of Philosophy"?
Anonymous said…
"Mr. "Phd" strikes again. Why is it you are unable to bring yourself to use the correct "Ph.D." which you probably don't know stands for "Doctor of Philosophy"?

7/14/2019 5:52 PM"

Well that sure counters the point.
Anonymous said…
Who wanted to counter his point?
Anonymous said…
"Who wanted to counter his point?"

Anyone that couldn't do so on any other grounds, as if you didn't know.
Anonymous said…
The only reason the director has a Ph.D. these days is because the Labbies would have an absolute meltdown if they did not. It could be a Nobel Laureate it Physics and they would talk BS on them while still kissing the ring. Hell they do that to the directors with PhDs.....
Anonymous said…
A more likely question is when will DTED split into two?

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!