Skip to main content

Former NNSA No. 2 to Lead Government Affairs for Nevada Site Contractor



"Neile Miller, former principal deputy administrator of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), has joined Nevada National Security Site operating contractor Mission Support and Test Services as head of government affairs, the company announced Monday."

https://www.exchangemonitor.com/former-nnsa-no-2-lead-government-affairs-nevada-site-contractor/?printmode=1

Comments

Anonymous said…
The "revolving door" is alive and well.
Anonymous said…
So what? Competence will out.
Anonymous said…
Isn't she the one who gave a "pass" grade to incompetent lab directors?
Anonymous said…
"NNSA Defends Contract Extensions but Congressional Scrutiny Expected"

"WASHINGTON – The National Nuclear Security Administration is defending itself against charges that it renewed lucrative deals for undeserving contractors, but the issue is likely to come up at congressional oversight hearings in the coming months, sources say."

"The firm that manages the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico “received only 68 percent of its possible at-risk award fee of $46.5 million for the last budget year, primarily because of cost overruns that ballooned a security project from $213 million to $254 million,” according to a press release from the organization."

"Nonetheless, Neile Miller, then the agency’s top award determining official and now its acting chief, overrode a decision by NNSA site personnel and granted Los Alamos National Security a waiver that extends its contract through fiscal 2018, the group said."

"A similar situation occurred regarding the contract of a consortium -- consisting of Bechtel National, the University of California, Babcock and Wilcox, the Washington Division of URS and Battelle -- that manages the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California, the group said."

"Lawrence Livermore National Security earned 78 percent of its “available at-risk incentive fee, still short of the gateway of 80 percent,” the group said.  “However, acting NNSA Administrator Neile Miller overrode that too, giving the lab contractor an extra $541,527 to help it meet the 80 percent mark and extending the management contract another year.”"

"The nonpartisan Government Accountability Office has also raised concerns about the extension of NNSA contracts for management of its facilities. Assistant Director Allison Bawden said last month that the inconsistent NNSA enforcement of contract terms could be problematic, the Nuclear Weapons Materials and Complex Monitor reported."

“What kind of message do these actions send to potential bidders on future … contracts?” Bawden said. “Will they take the contract structures as seriously?”"

"Agency spokesman Josh McConaha defended Miller’s decisions and suggested that the watchdog groups might be missing the bigger picture."

Watchdog groups aside, the GAO and the NNSA's Neile Miller apparently had VERY different views of what the "bigger picture" was in 2013.

https://www.nti.org/gsn/article/nnsa-defends-contract-extensions-congressional-scrutiny-expected/
Anonymous said…
8/25/2019 8:37 AM

Why is this very old news of interest to anyone?? LANS is long gone.
Anonymous said…
"Why is this very old news of interest to anyone?? LANS is long gone."

Because past is a prologue, and there were numerous NNSA Lab failures involving employee safety, the environment, and contractor misconduct after Neile Miller elected to cook the performance reviews of LANS and LLNS 2013. This is what happens when you move the goal line. The GAO perspective on this matter was the correct one.
Anonymous said…
"Because past is a prologue..."

8/26/2019 10:14 AM

Oh, BS with your ridiculous trope. You just have this insane insatiable need to keep bashing the NNSA labs because you think they screwed you over. Get over yourself.
Anonymous said…
"Oh, BS with your ridiculous trope. You just have this insane insatiable need to keep bashing the NNSA labs because you think they screwed you over. Get over yourself."

If you could only raise your magic wand and prevent any NNSA Lab criticisms from appearing on this blog, you'd finally have your contractor centric utopia. Then you could focus all of your time to discredit the motives of the DOE Office of Asessment, the DOE IG, the GAO, and the DNFSB? As the saying goes, "You are entitled to your opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.” Don't be such a sensitive and irrational baby.
Anonymous said…
I don't disagree with anything you said, as long as you drop the ridiculous and juvenile "past is prologue" garbage. If you aren't that poster (I suspect you aren't), then everything I responded to him still stands.
Anonymous said…
Mikey is back !
Anonymous said…
"Mikey is back !

8/30/2019 9:38 PM"

Oh, it gets better, Charlie is also coming back and in even bigger way than Mickey.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!