Skip to main content

Gov. slams planned nuclear waste storage site



SANTA FE – Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham came out swinging Friday against a planned facility to store spent nuclear fuel in southeast New Mexico, saying it would be “economic malpractice” to open such a site in an oil-rich region that’s also home to agricultural operations.

https://www.abqjournal.com/1325681/gov-lujan-grisham-against-planned-nm-nuclear-storage-facility.html

https://docs.house.gov/meetings/IF/IF18/20190613/109638/HHRG-116-IF18-20190613-SD007.pdf

Comments

Anonymous said…
Looks like NM no longer wishes to be the USA dumping ground for nuclear waste. Can't blame them for that. I am not aware of any CA locations willing to accept this radioactive waste.
Anonymous said…
Just holding out for more money
Anonymous said…
She only trots out the “I care about New Mexico oils and gas” when she see something more perverse. And I am guessing that it’s 240 permanent jobs as opposed to the bust - boom jobs offered by the oil and gas industry. Besides, America has no long term plan for permanent storage so we might as well take advantage of the money and jobs. How much does the federal government collect annually from the nuclear power plants for a long term repository. There is money to be made here.
Anonymous said…
"Just holding out for more money"

I don't know enough about the NM Governor to challenge your point. I do know after the WIPP radiological accident, NM residents have no reason to trust the competency of DOE or the NNSA. And, I do not see anyone in CA leadership with welcoming arms in Barstow, Mojave, or other CA areas encouraging this radiological waste storage to come our way.
Anonymous said…
If it is in New Mexico it is about money, in other words you need to pay off the right people. Fortunately, in New Mexico the price is not very high, 2k to 10k to a few people and the deal is done. In other parts of the real United States it would be in the millions with many contracts and favors to do something like this. So expect an announcement real soon that shipments of waste to New Mexico will be starting. Remember this is New Mexico so don't overthink things.
Anonymous said…
All the BILLIONS wasted on the Yucca Mountain site in Nevada that was supposed to store high level nuclear waste. Thats the real crime. I remember Harry Reid the senator of Nevada taking ALL the Billions to study and prepare the site so in the end he could come out and say not in my backyard when it was close to becoming reality.
Anonymous said…
I remember Harry Reid the senator of Nevada taking ALL the Billions to study and prepare the site so in the end he could come out and say not in my backyard when it was close to becoming reality.

8/10/2019 3:42 AM

Hey, give Harry a break. He simply elevated the Casino approach to fleecing the customer to the National Level.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Rumor corner

LLNS may have excluded the wrong people in last VSSOP? The exclusions were based on outdated job categories and related skills. ULM are now thinking that in the future, job categories and functional areas will have to be re-defined. The next VSSOP/ISP will be based on the new categories and functional areas. The questions I have are: 1) Why didnt they think of that before the transition. It seems like their style is “change things as you go”. Planning is out the window! 2) Who will give input on the new changes? The next RIF apparently is going to be more lucrative than the VSSOP. Depending on the length of employment, a RIFed person, not only gets their 1 week pay per year of service but also from 30 to 120 days notice, essentially 30 to 120 days pay. Please feel free to comment on the rumors or add new ones you actually heard.