Skip to main content

Coronavirus and LANL- LLNL

Coronavirus topic: If this gets going will part of the LLNL and LANL be devoted to fighting this, at least in terms of modeling and large scale simulations? Which place will be the big break out US city? The sure bets are LA, SF, Seattle but my guess it is going be something like Denver or Orlando first. This is actually starting to like possible pandemic.

Comments

Anonymous said…

LANL already has some work on the including a recent paper saying the infection rate is higher than what most people think. I am not sure what more LANL or LLNL could add beyond the already current modeling, all of which looks grim.

On the other hand it is interesting to see that the big news in MSM is Bernie Sanders, diversity, and sexist jokes from Bloomberg, no one really seems to care about the coronaries even though WHO is saying the "window to contain this is quickly closings". Seems like we will have more relevant things to worry about than stop and frisk.
Anonymous said…
LANL could also do genetic modeling to help create a vaccine.
Anonymous said…

Starting to spread, just a matter of time until some one of the labs gets, particularly with all the travel and the number of people
moving though.
Anonymous said…
See the LANL preprint in PDF form available at

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.07.20021154v1.full.pdf+html
Anonymous said…

With all the travel that people do at the labs and all the visitors from all over the world how long do you think it will be before it hits the labs? It could really get going at LANL since everybody goes to the same stores ect.
Anonymous said…
The labs don't matter. Many more regular people travel internationally every day than the lab people do in a year. The labs aren't going to be any different than anyone else, they will be infected just like everyone.
Anonymous said…

Rumor is that someone at LLNL just tested positive for the virus. I guess it has to start sometime.
Anonymous said…
It is not in the news. Must be just a rumour.
Anonymous said…
HIPPA rules being what they are, anything could be true, and would be believed before it is true. What would make the contagion probability any different for lab employees?
Anonymous said…
When the LANL director was asked what the Lab was doing about the coronavirus, he detailed a long list of other labs that Lab managers have contacted to discuss the subject. He then said that some LANL tools could be used. In other words, nothing is being done. A very sad reaction common to bureaucrats, who confuse activity with action.
Anonymous said…
What is an employer to do, except send everyone home (an excellent choice)? The fewer people everyone interacts with, the sooner this is gone. STAY HOME!!!

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

tcp1 looking good

I just received my annual TCP-1 letter from LLNS and a summary of the LLNS Pension Plan. Looked in pretty good shape in 2013. About 35% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 134.92%). This was a decrease from 2012 where it was 51% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 151.59%). They did note that the 2012 change in the law on how liabilities are calculated using interest rates improved the plan's position. Without the change the funding target attainment percentages would have been 118% (2012) and 105% (2013). 2013 assets = $2,057,866,902 2013 liabilities = $1,525,162,784 vs 2012 assets = $1,844,924,947 2012 liabilities = $1,217,043,150 It was also noted that a slightly different calculation method ("fair market value") designed to show a clearer picture of the plan' status as December 31, 2013 had; Assets = $2,403,098,433 Liabilities = $2,068,984,256 Funding ratio = 116.15% Its a closed plan with 3,781 participants. Of that number, 3,151 wer...