LLNS may have excluded the wrong people in last VSSOP? The exclusions were based on outdated job categories and related skills. ULM are now thinking that in the future, job categories and functional areas will have to be re-defined. The next VSSOP/ISP will be based on the new categories and functional areas. The questions I have are: 1) Why didnt they think of that before the transition. It seems like their style is “change things as you go”. Planning is out the window! 2) Who will give input on the new changes? The next RIF apparently is going to be more lucrative than the VSSOP. Depending on the length of employment, a RIFed person, not only gets their 1 week pay per year of service but also from 30 to 120 days notice, essentially 30 to 120 days pay. Please feel free to comment on the rumors or add new ones you actually heard.
Comments
4/15/2020 8:02 AM"
I am rather confused what NNSA lab work falls out of weapons related? Maybe you are you talking about NIF, which is considered weapons related by some. Other than that I am unaware of anything. I guess there is all the outreach and small business stuff which has lots of waste in it.
"At least half of all work done at all three weapons labs is non-weapon related. NIF has been double-dipping for decades. It may well be time to face the facts that instead of being both weapons and energy related it is neither weapons related nor energy related. "
Yes I am now very confused by your comments. Besides NIF, which again is argued to be weapons related and agree that is up for debate, the labs do mostly weapons work. The idea that half the work the labs do non-weapons work is just loony tunes, I mean out there in the great unknown. It it is so far off that one has to ask what is your point. Maybe at Sandia this is true but they have broader mission by definition.
"In these trying times, it should get thrown overboard as a luxury we cannot afford."
You might want to check the news, but in these "trying times" the labs may be getting more money for you know "reasons".
Speaking of trying times I have to ask...could you be posting from some other nation perhaps? There is something a bit off with your comments in any case 你好 Nǐ hǎo.
The answer to your question is simply past is prologue. If and when the need for a layoff arises, the NNSA and the contractor will have reviewed and finalized its terms together before the worker bees learn of its existence. It makes no financial sense for the contractor to go completely rogue in a layoff situation since the NNSA has very deep pockets to help the contractor if lab employee lawsuits follow a botched or mishandled layoff. Good question!