Skip to main content

llnlthetruestory is 13 years old today

 December 11th 2007, the start of this blog. It was intended to replace the short-lived llnlthefinalstory blog and as a step up from llnltherealstory one. 

As llnltherealstory sank into a period of virulent insults among LANL employees and inflammatory remarks towards LLNL's,  it was time to begin a new blog that encourages intelligent debate. 

The torch was lit and LANL readers saw it and hopped on fast.  Participation shot up and moderation was challenging despite clear blog rules. 

On the 1st anniversary, I asked for a volunteer to take it over.  I heard the echo of my own voice. 

Since then, I had brief help from "Doobydew" whose nickname I still use today. Thanks Doobydew! whoever you are.  I also hard help from a tech-savvy guy named "TheEvil Eye". Thank you. 

With some exceptions, LANL dominated this blog negatively and disregarded civility and the call for  intelligent debate. That made moderation that much difficult. 

13 years later, many have questioned the relevance of this platform.  I believe there is a need to have a place where issues are brought up, abuse is reported, important information is passed.

What does everyone think? 

Julian/Scooby/Doobydew


Comments

Anonymous said…
Just a thought. The blog should be moderated, and not by vague "rules" but by strict moderation for every post, or should be completely unmoderated (install a profanity filter if you wish). Anything in between leaves open the possibility of, and charges of, political or other bias when posts are deleted for no apparent reason.
Scooby said…
Could you suggest what a clear rule is? What makes the current rules vague?
Anonymous said…
What constitutes "inflammatory language"? What constitutes "put downs"? Leaves you a lot of space to delete what you don't like the tone of, or even disagree with or feel upset by. Prohibit profanity, threatening language (not "put downs"), and pornography. Let all the rest of the idiots post what they want. Or, restrict subjects to specific LLNL (include LANL if you wish) subjects based on laboratory mission and programs. Your choice - it's your blog. Just please restrict all the political, non-lab related, doofus crap that wastes megabits on social issues.
Scooby said…
I updated the rules with your input.
Thank you. One may argue that even the rule you proposed leaves room for interpretation.
Anonymous said…
Well Happy Birthday to the True Story. Scooby, thanks for keeping it going. While it may not be entertaining as the LANL forum was (we are boring in Livermore), it still is a small window into the place, and that is valuable to me. Yes, the trains of thought get sidetracked by Los Alamos (It always is about them) and now the political discussions which quickly dive into the deep end of a very dirty pool. Even with all of those distractions, I am grateful that you still are willing to run the three ring circus.
Anonymous said…
"Just please restrict all the political, non-lab related, doofus crap that wastes megabits on social issues."

Like it or not the labs are indeed connected to social issues. This could be how on how politics will determine funding, who controls the labs, pro war versus anti war sentiment, if testing could occur again, directions in basic and energy science. This is on top of the other issues like diversity, profit versus non-profit and ethical issues of war and so on. If something is completely off topic then Scooby does a good job and not posting it or steering to something that is related. It sort makes sense that labs that are related to nuclear weapons have to have some connections social issues or political issues by definition.



Anonymous said…
Thank you for letting LANL share some screen time.
Anonymous said…
Well, I for one think the new rules are an improvement, although not a big one, We'll see what happens, As with all "rules," the proof is with compliance/enforcement. Good luck!
Scooby said…
Hello 12/14/2020 12:50 PM
Thank you for being appreciative !
Anonymous said…
Re: LLNL vs LANL, in a sinking boat it helps if all are willing to bail, and row in unison.
Anonymous said…
The labs now are mainly job programs, guaranteed basic plus income. I’ve had a bunch of colleagues, including myself, leave for private industry, academics, or defense contractors. I’ve met people going to the labs who are washouts, c students, or have non-technical degrees from third-rate universities. I’m sure there is a core group keep the place afloat, but the major expansion is from unqualified people.
Anonymous said…
Thanks Scooby. I've read the blog since the beginning. You are doing a very needed service to the folks at LLNL (and LANL).
GreggS said…
Happy birthday, blog. It's been a heck of a ride getting here and looks like it'll be even less smooth in the years to come.

It was an honor to co-admin with Scooby. He is a very nice person in real life and so very dedicated to maintaining an active source of good information on the two labs for employees and retirees of those facilities. And like any admin Scooby has endured his critics, you never can satisfy everyone. I was glad to help shoulder that load for Scooby and let some of the heat come my way instead of all on him. Hopefully someday other folks will find a way to help Scooby.

Meanwhile a deep and heartfelt THANK YOU for all the work Scooby does for us all.
Scooby said…
Thanks buddy! I hope you are doing well!

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!