Skip to main content

Vaccine rumor

 There is some talk that if you do not get the vaccine or have not gotten the vaccine that you will facing disciplinary action. The other

rumor is that this coming rather fast. I would figure they would have tell us first that but maybe they are just going spring it on us out of nowhere. Anyone hear anything?

Comments

Anonymous said…

One thing that really annoys me is those dam accountability emails. You only have a few days to send in your response. What about those who do not have access to email for several weeks on end during the pandemic. I and many others are working from home and may have work hours that are not your work hours, or work weeks that our not you work weeks.
Anonymous said…
So you reject that your employer can require you to do something within a deadline?
Anonymous said…
So you reject that your employer can require you to do something within a deadline?

5/14/2021 5:41 PM

Look I can do plenty of work in my second home in Vail Colorado which I have spent the last year at, I think I deserve to some leeway with a deadline or two.
Anonymous said…
They should probably institute a VSIP to head off all the lawsuits associated with forcing an employee to accept an inadequately tested medical procedure as a condition of employment.
Anonymous said…
Ah, yes, Mr. “Rumor has it.”. Have you kept statistics on your rumors? Your rumors are very nearly always incorrect. Perhaps you should troll somewhere else.
Anonymous said…
5/15/2021 6:37 AM

I thought the rumors are correct most of the time. Could you name a few that have been wrong. By the way you do know that some of these are not rumors at all.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Rumor corner

LLNS may have excluded the wrong people in last VSSOP? The exclusions were based on outdated job categories and related skills. ULM are now thinking that in the future, job categories and functional areas will have to be re-defined. The next VSSOP/ISP will be based on the new categories and functional areas. The questions I have are: 1) Why didnt they think of that before the transition. It seems like their style is “change things as you go”. Planning is out the window! 2) Who will give input on the new changes? The next RIF apparently is going to be more lucrative than the VSSOP. Depending on the length of employment, a RIFed person, not only gets their 1 week pay per year of service but also from 30 to 120 days notice, essentially 30 to 120 days pay. Please feel free to comment on the rumors or add new ones you actually heard.