Skip to main content

Do you agree with the senators?

 Manchin and colleagues want in national labs infrastructure. 

https://www.energy.senate.gov/2021/7/manchin-joins-colleagues-in-urging-investment-in-national-lab-infrastructure

Comments

Anonymous said…

There will be a price of course. If you want the money you will have vote a certain way and think a certain way. Want 1 billion for infrastructure at LANL? Better hire the right people do the work, and oh by the way make sure that CRT training is mandatory.

Yes we want the money but are we willing to make the trade?
Anonymous said…
The punchline to a joke goes "We've already established what your are, we are now just haggling over the price."

Infrastructure - It means whatever they want it to mean. You want to make sense of it? It's politics in its basest form.
Anonymous said…
If you want the money you will have vote a certain way and think a certain way.

7/26/2021 8:17 PM

Oh, just give up that nonsense please. "Think in a certain way"?? Get real.
Anonymous said…
Oh, just give up that nonsense please. "Think in a certain way"?? Get real.

7/28/2021 6:40 PM

You are very naive of the way of the world my friend, very naive. On other other hand I suspect you are not naive at all and know exactly what is going one.
Anonymous said…
7/31/2021 1:41 PM

So you're saying you don't know anything? Yeah.
Anonymous said…

So you're saying you don't know anything? Yeah.

8/02/2021 5:36 PM

I am simply saying you are dishonest. You know exactly what is going on and why it is going on.
Anonymous said…
Yes I do. And I described it accurately.
Anonymous said…
Yes I do. And I described it accurately.

8/03/2021 6:37 PM

Only if your definition of accurate is utterly inaccurate...but hey you do you.
Anonymous said…
I keep asking for a clear indication of what you found inaccurate, and Scooby keeps deleting my simple question What is his agenda here? Wokeism runs rampant.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!