Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it. Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!
Comments
Some of the comments on the other blogs are kind interesting.
(1) I would guess they could get to 100% but how much greater would you need it to be really be viable as useful energy source is it 100, 10 times or just 3 time? Anyone have any ides
(2) One thing is also the cost per shot versus energy, I would guess if they could really get something going than ways to make it cheaper would be worked.
(3) If they get to 100% can this considered something that could be a Nobel prize? Although it is great technical feat I am not sure there is any grand new discovery science but perhaps I am wrong. Maby it just has lots of impact but from a series of smaller things rather than just one big result. In that is case I think it could be fair to give the prize. If it becomes a legit energy source or followup works using the same approach then I think it would qualify. The Nobel prize in physics includes technological advances as a possible criteria nut just scientific ones.
That is certainly a big jump up and something to be happy about. I have a couple of problems. The first is it is only a single shot, if they could that two shot, three shots and so on then I think this is major. The issue is that this was a single shot, no two samples are the same on the atomic level by definition so it could be some odd property go the surface of the sample, lack of grain boundaries or defects act, not to mention that rare events can arise where by chance some particles just happen to go the right way due to chaotic dynamics. This could be some kind of lucky shot kind of thing where some unknown parameter could be present that could hard to reproduce. Single event discoveries happen all the time that cannot be reproduced, like the magnetic monopole. Perhaps they know a lot more that will be in the paper that shows that this result is repeatable and can be built upon. Let us hope so., I am also a bit leery they that the go from 170 to 1.35 MJ, a rather large jump. It may be possible that the burning phase simply has a long trail distribution with mostly short times but occasionally you get a long time.
On a funny note I was watching popular sci-tech podcast tonight and they talked about the great new laser induced fusion just done at some place in California when someone said you mean UC Berkley National labs to be exact. Ha
Correct, Laser fusion will never be a viable energy source, and was never meant to be.