Skip to main content

LANL behind on NUC bomb cores

Image
By

 GAO: Lab faces four-year delay, cost growth for making nuclear bomb cores


https://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/local_news/gao-lab-faces-four-year-delay-cost-growth-for-making-nuclear-bomb-cores/article_92f2ad84-3dd4-11ee-b677-b76ab4ca1b91.html

Federal officials estimate Los Alamos National Laboratory won’t produce 30 nuclear bomb cores until 2030 — four years after the legally required deadline.

The additional time needed to produce 30 bowling-ball-sized warhead triggers, known as pits, will cost the lab significantly more than originally estimated, a government watchdog said in a newly released report.


I am shocked, shocked.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Meanwhile, the emperor has no clothes. This exact story has repeated itself at least a dozen times in my lifetime. The ability to use plutonium for anything is a complete joke in these United States. Among the factors contributing to this extremely negative outcome is the DNFSB.
8/24/2023 6:00 PM
Anonymous said…
Back in the Trump years another government body did a report on how to reform the dysfunctional culture within DNFSB:

https://napawash.org/academy-studies/defense-nuclear-facilities-safety-board-organizational-assessment

https://napawash.org/academy-studies/defense-nuclear-facilities-safety-board-phase-ii

The whole story behind this isn't entirely clear, but it also seems he tried to limit their oversight powers, and there was even an attempt to abolish it entirely:

https://www.propublica.org/article/nuclear-safety-board-information-access-trump-administration

https://www.armscontrol.org/blog/2019-02-27/controversy-over-nuclear-safety-board-scope-size

This was not the first time a critical change to the board’s structure had been proposed. The board’s previous chairman, Sean Sullivan, had proposed abolishing the DNFSB completely, in early 2018. This was rejected by the board and led to Sullivan’s resignation, leaving the normally five-person board down a member for most of the year.

Right now the five member board is missing two members for some reason:

https://www.dnfsb.gov/about/board-members

It sounds like one criticism of this board (I think noted in the report) is that their judgements related to what is safe and what is not, are somewhat arbitrary, and subjective.
8/26/2023 5:51 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

LLNL un-diversity

By scooby
Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!
79 comments
Read more