This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA.
The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore,
The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them.
Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted.
Blog author serves as a moderator.
For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com
Blog rules
Stay on topic.
No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
NO NAME CALLING.
No political debate.
Posts and comments are posted several times a day.
Friday, May 17, 2024
LLNL 2026
The “LANSLLNS” for-profit cash cow empire, took a blow when LANS lost the contract to manage LANL in favor of Triad.
Will the surviving for-profit LLNS retain the contract to manage LLNL in 2026?
6 comments:
Anonymous
said...
The low hanging fruit here is a 10% CA sales tax exemption with a non-profit LLNL contractor in 2026, on top of a non-profit lower annual award fee.
Would the state of California lobby for LLNS as a for-profit entity in order to keep the 10% sales tax in play?
The state of New Mexico and local NM communities, lobbied for a for-profit status contractor to manage LANL for that very reason, and NNSA leadership said no thank you, and awarded the LANL contract to Triad, a non-profit, when the NNSA removed LANS, the prior for-profit contractor from LANL.
6 comments:
The low hanging fruit here is a 10% CA sales tax exemption with a non-profit LLNL contractor in 2026, on top of a non-profit lower annual award fee.
I think LLNLs will be out.
Never underestimate the pond scum residue of Bechtel.
Good points, but how “well connected” is LLNS really, to keep them the LLNL contractor in 2026 and beyond?
Would the state of California lobby for LLNS as a for-profit entity in order to keep the 10% sales tax in play?
Would the state of California lobby for LLNS as a for-profit entity in order to keep the 10% sales tax in play?
The state of New Mexico and local NM communities, lobbied for a for-profit status contractor to manage LANL for that very reason, and NNSA leadership said no thank you, and awarded the LANL contract to Triad, a non-profit, when the NNSA removed LANS, the prior for-profit contractor from LANL.
Post a Comment