Skip to main content

China is ahead of U.S

 Australia released a report saying that China has leading research over the US in almost every critical field:


https://www.aspi.org.au/report/aspis-two-decade-critical-technology-tracker


This highlights the importance for the US of working with allies, they point out. 

Comments

Anonymous said…
Maybe it won't matter since humans could become extinct soon anyways. After all it is better dead than red, as the saying goes, so perhaps this is all for the best.

For example check out this video which says AI may kill everyone in the next few years --- they cite someone who gives it a 70% chance I think:

https://youtu.be/8kBd0CM5tuA?si=j9Mr-Pyc1uNBfHrx
Anonymous said…
How will AI kill everyone in a few years? I think the AI thing is a bit of bubble.
Anonymous said…
The thing about China is that they are more committed to TRL 4-9 research while the US funds TRL 1-3 and some 8 and 9. As a result, we develop the basic science and then China takes our work and deploys it. The valley of death is so wide now that once you demonstrate a basic principle, nobody will fund it. We spend all of our time chasing the shiny new object and incrementally advancing 50 year old technology. The basic research to deployed product pipeline is broken, with the exception of IT and software.
Anonymous said…
10:44 -- is this exactly true? The US has many startup companies, as you know, and deep capital markets, meaning that money can flood into strategic areas. We have some success stories, such as Nvidia recently becoming one of the world's very largest companies by market cap, and SpaceX launching its huge rocket. Fracking has been a huge success for energy independence, allowing the growth of the petrochemical industry as well.

The Chinese are advancing older technology more than we are -- low cost silicon solar cells for example, mass production of steel and concrete, coal power plants, use of cheap labor rather than automation.
Anonymous said…
You know, the Chips act for domestic semiconductor manufacturing has some recent problems. Intel got rid of 15000 workers, and their stock has plunged, losing 60% of its value since the beginning of 2024. There has also been a string of not-so-great news, although their turnaround still seems to be in place somehow. They may be removed from the Dow index, of course, Reuters also reported issues with their new semiconductor process 18A which will be released in the future, and the 20A node has been removed from their roadmap. There have also been failures of high-end gaming CPU's due to motherboard issues, and Intel has had to extend the warranty as a result.
Anonymous said…
You know, most good physicists believe in the many-worlds theory. If we truly believe in the "better dead than red" theory we can simply build a doomsday device of some sort capable of causing human extinction and employ it in the worlds where Red China triumphs, this will leave behind an infinite set of universes where the US triumphs, cheating them of their victory. This would have the added benefit that the doomsday device could be used to avoid all sorts of bad outcomes, in effect giving the US complete control over our destiny, and complete control over future events, lowering the risk of future wars, terrorist attacks, economic problems, transportation accidents, failed medical procedures, and even weather events such as hurricanes and tornadoes to zero (at least from the viewpoint of the many worlds which would escape total destruction).

The existence of such a doomsday device might be highly demoralizing to the Chinese communists, and indeed they might be easier to deal with, although we would have to guard against them building their own doomsday device to cause human extinction so as to enact a similar plan -- we would have to set off our own device at the first sign or suspicion of this!

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!