Skip to main content

LANL safety survey

 LANL had DuPont safety culture survey. The results were a total disaster for LANL. It is scored on 0 to 100, and LANL got 54. LANL falls in the "dependent" safety culture zone which not a good position.


Dependent Stage
The Dependent Stage is the second level of the Bradley Curve, where workers comply with directives from management about policies and practices. Safety awareness and training have increased, but motivation comes from outside sources such as management pressure. Although fewer, accidents are still thought to be inevitable.

Employee ownership of safety measures is limited at this point, despite a heightened awareness of safety hazards. They don’t follow policies or processes because they wish to; they do so because they feel they have to. There’s little to no effort to enhance the current quo of safety. Instead, employees might consider that solely the role of upper management. It would be uncommon for employees to ask for criticism or opportunities for improvement since they consider accidents as isolated incidents or bad luck.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Safety is a bureaucratic farce at LANL, the ultimate work free safe zone.
Anonymous said…
Let's say you bring in $3M for a new program. $2.5M of that goes to overhead and you have $500K remaining to get stuff done. Then you try to do some work, but that requires support organizations like craft, facilities, procurement, engineering or waste to assist. They ask you for a charge code, thus taking an additional $250K to do jobs that should already be covered under overhead. Now you are left with about $250K to do the actual R&D. As a result, you have two choices. You can do very little and let the project end in failure. Or you can violate the safety rules and try to make some progress, maybe get fired too. Neither are good options.
Anonymous said…
Here is another example. You are doing some important national security R&D and the NNSA has given you deadlines when the funding cuts off. Unfortunately, since the facilities are very old, the 208V circuit to your equipment suffers a fault. No problem, you contact building management and they say, yes we can fix it, give us about 3 years to replace and upgrade this old panel. Ok, now you have a decision to make. Let the program fail and the funding go to waste, maybe get fired since your work goes nowhere. Or you can take your chances, put a bubblegum wrapper in the 1950s fuse slot and probably finish before anybody notices. There is also some small chance it will blow up and cause a safety incident. Neither is a good option.
Anonymous said…
But suppose you have 3 million dollars and were able to employ it at a 10% rate of return, while government borrowing costs less than 5%. This would not be hard by investing in something like Berkshire Hathaway if the market does well. With the resulting $150,000 a year which would continue to perpetuity, you could produce 10,000 papers a year using the new automated programs to produce scientific work. This amounts to one scientific or engineering paper every 52 minutes, the quality of which would increase over time while they would be delivered at an ever-increasing rate, working day and night to build upon previous research results.

As for safety there will be less issues related to human harm once all humans are removed from the process, in fact someday we can transfer all humans into the metaverse, which will run on redundant computers deep underground, of course.

Meanwhile of course, the government's investment in Berkshire would no doubt skyrocket as well, as they would employ AI advances to downsize labor costs while enhancing productivity. As humans are transferred into the metaverse, their earthly assets and resources could be used to promote the economy even more!
Anonymous said…
It is amazing that the DuPont survey uses the idea that safety-related accidents can be reduced to zero as a measure of the success of the safety culture. No serious scientist believes that the probability of a random event is zero. Yet, here we are, being preached to by wannabees.
Anonymous said…
8/14/2024 8:12 PM, no you are wrong, you cowboy. NNSA has already found the secret to eliminate all accidents with probability of one: terminate all work and the safety incident rate will go to zero. It's people like you who are fighting the system in the name of science and some bizarre ethical need to do work in exchange for a paycheck that have thwarted the governments efforts.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!