Skip to main content

American researchers achieve nuclear reactor breakthrough

Image
By scooby

 

Hello!

Any scientist in this blog, please explain to us why is this considered a breakthrough?

Much obliged.

https://www.yahoo.com/tech/american-researchers-achieve-nuclear-reactor-103015064.html

Comments

Anonymous said…
These are better references, from Argonne's web site and the original journal article:

https://www.anl.gov/article/when-its-hotter-than-hot-scientists-know-how-nuclear-fuel-behaves-thanks-to-new-research-from

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41563-024-01883-3
10/19/2024 6:34 AM
Anonymous said…
I'm not sure it is a breakthrough. It would depend on your definition of "breakthrough". It also doesn't seem to be a claim made by the authors of the work.
10/19/2024 9:06 AM
Anonymous said…
It is a materials discovery. That is long way to go from there to nuclear energy. It is nice but the headline is hype. I would figure by now that after 5-10 years of hype headlines, in science and there has been a lot in the last 10 years people would figure out just to ignore this stuff.
10/20/2024 11:19 AM
Anonymous said…
It is not a breakthrough. The people at Karlsruhe were doing experiments with other techniques on UO2 after Three Mile Island. What I want to know is at what temperature reactor fuel becomes liquid. We ALL thought that would be when UO2 melts at around 3138K. Three Mile Island showed us otherwise. UO2 dissolves into liquid metals when the metal melts, around 2000k for zirconium. Think salt and water. Salt melts at a much higher temperature than it dissolves into water.
11/03/2024 2:46 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

LLNL un-diversity

By scooby
Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!
79 comments
Read more